• The Harris campaign is showing new strength in must-win states ahead of the party’s convention.
  • In Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Harris leads Trump 50% to 46% among likely voters.
  • It’s a reflection of the continued reset of the 2024 race after Biden’s exit.
  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    In Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Harris leads Trump 50% to 46% among likely voters.

    That’s within the margin of error. That doesn’t really count as a lead.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, but Trump’s leads were also within the margin of error, so it’s encouraging to see a swing, even if it might just be noise.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      She’s only been campaigning for a few weeks. The DNC hasn’t even happened yet. I would call this pretty phenomenal.

    • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Jfc people went ape shit when 1-2% was called within the margin of error a few days ago and now folks complain when it isn’t called out at 4% lmao

        • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Preach.

          Yes it’s all margin of error. But what I’m seeing personally is Biden was consistently 2-4% down (conservatively) in every state that mattered (which was within the margin of error) and Harris is up 2-4% in every state that matters now (which is also within the margin of error).

          I’d rather be the Harris campaign right now than the (now defunct) Biden or (panicking) Trump campaigns. Qualify it all you want folks 🤷‍♂️

          No I’m not complacent. I’m excited to vote.

            • Irremarkable@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I mean, click a couple links and it’s right there

              MI: 619 PA: 693 WI: 661 All of registered voters

              Using the amount of total registered voters in each respective state and a 95% CI, we get the following margins of error MI: ±3.939% PA: ±3.723% WI: ±3.811%

              Depending on the exact lead (NYT only shows round percents, not specific numbers for each response), all of those are potentially within the top end of that margin of error.

              Am I trying to claim that a swing from being down by ~4% to being up by ~4% means nothing and is indicative of nothing? Of course not. But man, most people really do not at all understand how statistics work, and I really wish people would stop talking out of their ass about it.

            • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I love how any time someone wants to argue about stats they act like this information can’t possibly be obtained and talk as if the sample size must be like 7 people.

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are they the same people?

        You are aware that different people can think different things, right?

        • SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Wow you aren’t all the same people!? You aren’t all one person!? Man yeah that is literally the only way my comment could be interpreted. There are clearly no largely shared opinions here ever so I’m clearly living in a fantasy and just need to remember everyone is completely unique and no one agrees. Thanks for your concern you can move on now.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which people? I don’t recall seeing any comments like that on Lemmy, at least.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe not, but it’s encouraging! Harris/Walz are stoking enthusiasm because they want to actually improve people’s lives, not just repeat the same tired culture-war bullshit…

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t know the margin of error unless you know the sample size. I didn’t see the sample size mentioned in the article.