Technically it’s for any printer capable of printing a firearm or the components of a firearm, which is…. every printer. What a bafflingly stupid proposal. If you’re in NY, please call your reps and tell them to oppose this bill.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh don’t worry, there will be a third. And a fourth. And a… Well, more and more until it passes

      It only has to pass once

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Political hackers.

        The people have to be successful every time, but the political hackers have to successful just once.

    • fluxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well, everyone knows only main boards have a serial number, so you need a permit for that. But the rest is a spare part, you can get it freely.

      /s

  • tht@social.pwned.page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is braindead, are they gonna require background checks for the hardware store next?

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Don’t forget sporting goods and kitchen supplies. Heck, you can get a bunch of decent knives in IKEA, better put furniture outlets on a watchlist.

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Are they going to require background checks for purchasing metal working equipment? Or maybe just make it illegal to bring any metal to melting point without a license.

    Because you can make guns with metal.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It just buy a gun third party or at a gun show in a state without background check requirements.

      This isn’t rocket science.

      • deFrisselle@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Background checks are a Federal requirement and any transfer requires it go through an FFL for just that reason There is no Gun Show Loophole

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          The loophole is largely in the matter of enforcement. It is comically easy to evade these regulation or outright ignore them.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Again. This bill was introduced last year, by the same person, and it died at the time because of some grassroots actions. Now, the wording is slightly different (so it can be introduced again as a “different” bill), and it’s being tried again.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    How stupid, I use my printer to print minis for DnD. But, wait, it could theoretically print a gun, better get a background check, and have a waiting period of 6 months… fucking stupid.

    Let’s try to address the problems that led to this. Nah, let’s try to ban stuff instead.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      It won’t even be effective. As I pointed out earlier, hoodlums in the ghetto, who are the implicit targets of this, aren’t buying Bambus and becoming 3D printing experts overnight just to run off one off-the-books Glock. Someone with five or six brain cells to rub together is printing guns in quantity and selling them to the criminals. Anyone willing to employ that business model can and will simply kit build a printer rather than buying an off the shelf unit, which is certainly not difficult to do. It just adds one extra step to the operation for anyone who truly wants to do this, and 3D printing a working firearm is already a pretty decent commitment especially if you’re not already an experienced printer. Especially Glock frames.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ehhh typically the hood gunsmith is the guy with a 10 stack of braincells, who gets an ender and becomes decent enough with it to print a lower, slap a cheap nbs parts kit in it and finish it with an even-cheaper-than-PSA upper, and sell it for $200 to anyone he knows, rinse and repeat. Really makes his money printing switches and DIAS.

        Still though, stupid law.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Make a community with a dude that makes potassium and another dude that makes sulfur and then you can really make things go off

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I built my own, so I guess stepper motors and heating elements should also be under the law.

  • alleycat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you’re european and ask yourself why 3D printed guns are such an issue in the US: It’s not because entire guns are easy to print (or printable at all), It’s because of their idiotic gun laws: in the US, the only controlled part is the receiver or frame, which often enough is made of plastic anyway, while the most important part -the barrel- is freely obtainable.

    […]frames or receivers of firearms are “firearms” as defined in the law and are subject to the same controls as complete firearms."

    Germany has a similar law, except that every part of the gun is controlled.