• CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Muddied? There’s this thing called “nuance.” I support Donbas independence, I simply don’t think it gives Russia the right to invade anywhere outside of Donbas, is that that complicated to understand?

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So if you invade another country and as part of their defense of their country, their military enters your country, they’re now the aggressors?

      Do you apply that principal to all conflicts, or only against enemies of the West?

          • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So let me get this straight: if the US/Canada were hostile with each other, and the people of Alberta, Canada, were separatists that allied themselves with the US, but the Canadian government refused to recognize Alberta’s sovereignty, you would support a full-scale, deadly American invasion of Canada?

            • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              To be clear, to be a true analog the province needs to be an ethnic minority which is being targeted by the national government.

              Say Alberta was the only majority English speaking province, and Ottawa started putting up statues of a Quebecois terrorist leader from 80 years ago who lead the massacre of 100k English speakers and allied with Hitler during WW2, then they announced that English would be banned from all government facilities including primary schools, and when Alberta tried to secede they sent Nazi paramilitary death squads to harass them and started bombing them daily.

              At that point, if the US interceded and went past the Albertan border to attack other military targets in Canada, you would consider that a war of aggression by America against Canada and not them defending their ally, Alberta?

              • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                At that point, if the US interceded and went past the Albertan border to attack other military targets in Canada, you would consider that a war of aggression by America against Canada and not them defending their ally, Alberta?

                If America’s massacring civilians in Ottawa and Toronto? Yes, of course I would. Any sane person would. Stay in Alberta.

                You people call yourselves anti-war? I think you’re the real liberals here.

                • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What number of civilians have to die before your defensive war is an unacceptable war of aggression now?

                  Did the Allied counter offensive against the Nazis come in below that number? How about the Union during the US civil war?

                  • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You people are pro-war whenever it’s convenient for you I guess. Those comparisons are out of line and clearly different as I already explained.

    • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When 99.9% of people who unironically use the word tankie, and think that ‘fascist’ means ‘anything I don’t like’, also fiercely oppose Donbas independence, and when the one I’m talking to is also refusing to just give a clear answer, I’m not about to say I’m in the wrong for asking some clarifying questions.

      Also, why doesn’t it give Russia the right to invade? Was it wrong for the allies to invade Germany proper during WW2?

      • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        when the one I’m talking to is also refusing to just give a clear answer

        I very clearly said I supported their independence, but okay.

        Also, why doesn’t it give Russia the right to invade?

        So let me get this straight, you support civilians being massacred and innocent lives being lost? You really think Ukraine is on the same level of Nazi fucking Germany? Honestly I wouldn’t even much of a problem if they just invaded Donbas but they’re invading the whole fucking country and causing so much death and destruction. How is that justified? How can you call yourself anti-war and anti-imperialism and justify a brutal invasion? Some true colors being shown…

        • panopticon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you support civilians being massacred and innocent lives being lost?

          no, this was why the people’s republics of donetsk and luhansk invited military aid, and was the cause behind the Minsk agreements as well as Russia recognizing the Donbas republics