• Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Shapiro has Israel baggage that I am so glad I don’t have to hear about online for the next forever. Kelly had a messy divorce that I’m sure nobody wants to have dredged up. Walz seems relatable to a great number of people.

      Plus, he drives a 1979 IH Scout.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Shapiro’s Israel issue would have been a toss-up issue. Some independents wanted him to be very pro-Israel, others no so much. Probably wouldn’t have made a huge difference.

        On the other hand, might have made a difference in Michigan among the large muslim minority who may not have come out to vote.

        I really just hope Walz is not going to be another Kaine.

          • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Democrats are very divided on Israel but lots are very pro-Israel. Most American Jews vote Democratic.

            Doesn’t mean they agree with Netanyahu’s handling of Gaza, but pro-Israel nonetheless.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Okay, but lots of Democrats won’t vote for a pro-genocide administration. Someone who volunteered to be a soldier for their regime would have been seen as proof to them that Kamala was just as bad as Biden on Israel.

              • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Wouldn’t have mattered much when the alternative is Trump, which would be a thousand times worse than any candidate the Democrats could come up with.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Not all Democrats will vote blue no matter who and Harris’s pick seems to be an acknowledgement that she can’t afford to piss off the uncommitted movement.

            • girthero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              As evident in Cori Bush getting primaried then losing. AOC dialed back her anti Israel stance for fear of getting primaried herself. Saw an interview where she spoke candidly about that.

              • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah, people on social media, including Lemmy and Reddit, think that Democrats are definitely not pro-Israel. Many are. The party includes a wide range of opinions on Israel.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I remember listening to a podcast they would make, a lady and a guy and Nate Silver. I think it’s that podcast that makes me not really like him or his ideas aside from the numbers and the team he surrounds himself with. I look at 538 and I trust it for the most part but if it has Silver attached to it, I think of it as editorial

        • BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          538 no longer has Nate Silver or his model; Disney bought it and fired him like a year ago or so.

          Still, I agree; I don’t like his politics, but his analysis of polls and numbers is probably the best out there.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          He seems to have gotten more right-wing in recent years, although he doesn’t talk about it too explicitly (maybe he was always like that and I just didn’t know).

          I remember him downplaying the J6 insurrection during one of the podcasts which was the point where I lost a lot of respect for him, and frankly him leaving isn’t a big loss as he seemed to be just over election modelling in general by the end.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, it doesn’t get much better. Silver’s great when it’s just about numbers, but less so when it’s slightly more intangible. This column might be the peak example.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You should read through the comments on that post.

      Almost NONE of Silvers subscribers are having it.

      This just a way off base miss of Silvers.

      Believe the numbers, doubt the pundit.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Silver’s claim that Walz is a Tim Kaine pick is just dead on arrival. I’m sorry, I appreciate his actual model, but his argument here is just too speculative.

      • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I typically like Nate, but today’s column seemed sloppy. I don’t see how Walz is the “safe” choice - he’s further left than Shapiro. I also didn’t get what he was saying about Minnesota values not translating. I think Walz was a bold pick and I’m happy with the choice.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Seconded. Walz isn’t “safe” if you look at his policies. He’s pretty far left and is just fine implementing social policy, gun control, and using government money to fund social programs. That’s pretty radical if you’re a Republican. While he isn’t a policymaker as the VP, he’s a tie-breaker and he’s a future presidential candidate should Harris win.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      He doesn’t even understand that “Minnesota Nice” is not a compliment. It refers to when people who have lived here their whole lives and have close often going back to high school. When someone from out of state moves to Minnesota, their co-workers, neighbors etc will be friendly, act interested in the newbs lives, and even offer things like “we should get together sometime”. That is in no way an invitation to actually do anything. If the newb proposes a date “to get the kids together”, the Minnesotan will hem, haw and make up excuses.

      Minnesota Nice is a special kind of nice.

      • roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        In case you’re not aware, 538 was acquired by Disney/ABC, and he’s no longer involved with them.

        So yeah, he’s just a pundit now, and his punditry was never that great to begin with. The Model is what made him good