![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4095722b-93d8-463e-bd80-4e0451f7efe7.jpeg)
I was going to ask if they count the frontage roads as part of the highway in TX. Because that’s not right.
I was going to ask if they count the frontage roads as part of the highway in TX. Because that’s not right.
We did not have the level of wanton ignorance and denial of evolution that we have now. Back then, I wouldn’t have believed you if you told me that half the country turned out to be so stupid.
Exactly and you can control where it goes by wiggling your ass.
two sheets versus a couple of giant wads? You’re definitely reducing your TP usage.
a sheet of TP or drip dry.
Its is relevant in a bass ackwards way. It shows that gender is innate and not a social construct based on how you were raised. Of course the logical conclusion is the exact opposite of what the OP guy believes.
Can you imagine the harm that would have happened if he just so happened to be transgender?
Age to drive: 16? Still a teenager Age of consent: varies by state but is generally around 15 or so. Smoke: gross. But I never heard of a teenager having much problems acquiring tobacco, alcohol, or weed.
That is exactly what gender affirming care for youths is. Its basically staving off puberty until they are old enough to determine that they really do want medical transisition.
The schools do because of the laws that say if you attend school you are required to have these vaccinations.
You could have gotten his brother Clint for cheaper.
By your logic it would be a positive for your code to have errors/warnings. And on the latter, that would appropriate if there was a test that determined if you are free from all known diseases (or at least those that it can detect).
That’s why I said false negative. The medical test is testing for the presence of a disease. So if they find the disease is considered a positive test (it found what it was looking for). For static analysis on code, its the opposite. Its testing if your code is free of issues that it can detect. If it finds no issues, then the test was positive. If does find issues, the test failed and each issue is a negative that contributed to the test failing.
Warnings and errors are negatives not positive. So if it generates a warning that is OK, it’s a false negative.
A. State Legislature writes laws and they are passed when the executive branch (governor) signs them B. State supreme court determines if laws that have been passed are legal (if challenged). They don’t write laws. C. They already had the voters decide in 2020. It passed and the legislature refused to follow through and said “no, we’re not gonna do that”
So what’s going to stop SD from doing the same thing this time?
They (SD) already voted to approve in 2020 but the legislature said “nope, we’re not doing that”.
Then things will have to wait until the code is of sufficient quality to be accepted.
My experience is exactly the opposite. I don’t work for a FAANG but I’ve been around the block a bit. Its always the junior devs that try and add new warnings etc to the code base. I always require warnings to be cleaned up even if that means disabling specific instances (but not the whole rule) because the rule is flagging a false negative.
Are you sure that Florida and SD don’t have potential amendments to ban abortion? And we already know how much SD cares about ballot measures. Their constituents voted to legalize pot but their legislature just went “nah, we’re not going to do that”.
Technically its the lower court but you know they will all be appealed and ultimately the supreme court will decide.