• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They don’t understand that Trump is just as pro-Israel as Biden, if not even more so considering he moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Congress is bipartisan pro-Israel. This isn’t even a presidential issue.

      Biden just happens to be the guy doing the pro-Israel stuff at the moment, so he’s eating the lions share of the public ire.

      “You have to support the Pro-Israel guy because the other guy is pro-Israel and both party leaders are pro-Israel and the cops are trained by Israelis and Israeli businesses have strong ties with the MIC and Big Finance needs Israel to control trade through the Suez and you’re outnumbered and outgunned so quit fighting, just vote for Joe Biden” just isn’t a winning message among progressive voters this year.

      Maybe try it again in 2026.

      • gears@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My company buys a specific board from an Israeli company.

        We have been working on an in house alternative for a few years now. Now we’re scared to actually perform the switch because of the anti-boycott laws

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The thing is: Biden is pro-Israel but also pro-Palestinians. He’s providing aid to Gazans and pressuring Israel to minimize civilian casualties. It’s not great, or even good, I agree - but it’s a whole lot better than Trump who would be pro-Israel and anti-Palestinians. You’d see humanitarian aid end and the US support total war instead of the (slightly) restrained version we’re seeing now.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Biden is pro-Israel but also pro-Palestinians.

          Biden’s Increasingly Contradictory Israel Policy: A former State Department official explains the Administration’s sharpening public critique of Israel’s war and simultaneous refusal to “impose a single cost or consequence.”

          Right now it seems like the Biden Administration is trying to pressure Israel not to launch a military assault on Rafah and to allow in more humanitarian aid. At the same time, it has shown an unwillingness to take strong steps to punish Israel or to restrict the flow of aid or weapons to Israel if the Israelis disregard that pressure. How do you understand the strategy now?

          I’d call the Biden Administration’s approach “passive-aggressive.” They are angry at Netanyahu, and were even before this. He’s presiding over the most extreme government in the history of the state of Israel. That government and the preceding dozen years of Netanyahu’s tenure are undermining the two fundamental drivers of the U.S.-Israeli relationship, which are shared values and common interests. So, it’s passive-aggressive in the sense that, six months into the war, the Administration has still been unwilling—unable—to impose a single cost or consequence that you and I, as normal human beings, would describe as real pressure.

          Unable or unwilling?

          Both, but I’ll get to that in a second. There were three levers the Administration could’ve pulled. They’re still available. No. 1 is to end U.S. military assistance. There’s no indication the Administration’s anywhere close to that. It just approved a shipment of two-thousand-pound bombs, and twenty F-35s. No. 2, change the U.S. voting posture at the U.N., either by introducing its own Security Council resolution, or by voting for someone else’s, that is very critical of Israel. It has not done that. No. 3, abandon the whole notion of negotiating the hostage release and simply join the chorus of those in the international community who basically say, “You need to pressure Israel to cease this military campaign.”

          And I think it has not done these things

          Biden is pro-Getting Relected. And he recognizes that his party is increasingly pro-Palestinian. However, his current policy appears to be a CYA strategy, intended to create the illusion of neutrality while negotiating a path that allows Israel to continue its extermination of Arab people across the region.

          As this exterminationist Israeli agenda becomes more undeniable, the job of appearing neutral grows more difficult. And Biden’s decision to (tacitly) back Israel at all costs means risking friendly relations with Turkyie, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. However, he’s staying the course, precisely because he’s banking on a mass expulsion and genocide of Palestinians today will strengthen Israel’s regional position in the future.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The GOP openly courts antisemites while also supporting Israel. They make sure to have all the awful bases covered.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      He absolutely is more so. Also, young people have more power to influence Biden because they are part of his coalition. Of course, using this power is tricky because you need to pressure and criticize Biden without actually making him lose. So far I support the pressure campaign but I hope as the election gets closer people will start to realize what an epic disaster Trump term two would be.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are young people really a part of Bidens coalition? Bidens policies and rhetoric have consistantly pushed young people away. The ridiculous speech he gave just a few minutes ago maligning student protestors is emblematic of this.

        And it seems like young people have got the message. The last poll I saw had 18-24yr olds voting for Trump at +8%

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Young people are part of the coalition but they’ve never proven to be a reliable part. When the 18-25s vote like the older generations then campaigns will start to take their needs more seriously.

            • BakerBagel@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s a two way street. Young progressives don’t see any reason to vote for Democrats who won’t fight for any of the policies they care about, so they wont defend or fight for those officials.

              If i am thirsty and someone is offering me toilet water after they just shit in the toilet, I don’t need to show gratitude to the next person who comes by offering water from their toilet after they pissed in it.

              • makyo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Your analogy is completely absurd though, it’s more like voting for cake and getting bread - and then being so pissed off about the bread that you let bread guy get voted out in favor of toilet guy.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Hold it!

                  Let me make sure I’ve got that right. In this analogy, a candidate supporting genocide is a perfectly fine option, and people who have a problem with him are comparable to picky eaters?

                  • makyo@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Trump would probably be just fine with nuking Palestine so consider that when you think about what’s the shit and what’s the bread.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        “because you need to pressure and criticize Biden without actually making him lose”

        “We need to be toothless about our criticism of Biden” FTFY

        The threat of making your candidate lose is the only power you have to shift them.

        Next time you’re negotiating for a car, see how much the seller budges after you preceed negotiations with “Now, I am fully committed and happy paying sticker price, but how much can you lower the price?”

        Edit: at least have the intellectual honesty to say out loud that Biden could do anything, and you’d still vote for him

    • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And once again, as the foreign trolls that are busy courting our youth want, not one comment in this entire thread mentions that Europe is on the brink of open modernized war should Ukraine fall to vlad “Ukraine is just a stepping stone” putin.

      Gaza is a genocide, but that is not the critical geopolitical stage to be paying the most attention to. Once again it is completely ignored that the heads of hamas who attacked israel on oct 7 knowing exactly what they were about to cause are friends of putin.

      The Gaza genocide was provoked precisely to pull western eyes from the Ukrainian front where russia was more than underperforming to ensure their victory in a sustained war of attrition.

      You want to avoid a world war? You vote for biden whether u do it proudly or do it holding ur nose the way most of the sane will.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If what you say is correct, then it would seem that the onus is on Israel to stop the genocide in order to save its European benefactors.

        • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The onus to sane action is on everyone. Israel is in the wrong no matter which way u cut the pie. It does not mean that ignoring whats happening north of israel is validated bc the apartheid state is acting the way it always has.

      • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The Gaza genocide did not start on Oct 7, much like the Russian incursion on Unkraine did not start in Jan 2022. Both of those are tremendous blights on human rights and should be equally condemned.

        Of course, voting for Biden is the only stable option as much as one may lament that it shouldn’t be.

          • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The other candidate will also support the Gaza genocide. Again, it’s unfortunate that both candidates are evil. And supporting the lesser evil is a bad long term strategy.

            But, here we are.