See title. For those who don’t know, the Mandela Effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remember something differently than how it occurred. It’s named after Nelson Mandela because a significant number of people remembered him dying in prison in the 1980s, even though he actually passed away in 2013.

I’m curious to hear about your personal experiences with this phenomenon. Have you ever remembered an event, fact, or detail that turned out to be different from reality? What was it and how did you react when you found out your memory didn’t align with the facts? Does it happen often?

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    I remember there was an AskLemmy question on the Mandela effect, but a week later we all realized it was just a dream.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The Berenstein Bears one and the Fruit of the Loom not having a horn are the ones that have me questioning reality and my childhood.

    • hactar42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is a theory that the Fruit of the Loom one is actually a viral marketing thing. Like the company scrubbed it on purpose and is playing into it to build brand recognition.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m never sure if Castro is dead or not. I was sure for very long time that he died already but it would turn out that he’s still there. I also don’t remember any events specifically related to his death. His brother (?) took over and he kind of fizzled out before he died. Or maybe he’s still there? I’m never quite sure. I mean, it’s 2024 now, he’s definitely dead. Or is he?

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      He is since 2016, at least that’s what they want us to think.

      There were probably a few things that contributed to the confusion. Hugo Chavez was very friendly with Castro and he died of cancer, before Fidel. Fidel was also super old, and his brother Raul took a more prominent role a few years before his death, so there was less visibility.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Somehow I had always thought it was Klu Klux Klan instead of Ku Klux Klan. I’m not sure where I got that or if anyone else thought the same thing though.

      • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The romans pronounced it “uike uersa” or “wike wersa” (two syllables for each word). The letter “c” was always a k-sound, and “v” was like our “u”, it was the same letter for a long time. So another example, if you want to say “Veni vidi vici” the historically accurate way would be “Weni widi wiki”.

          • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s been thoroughly researched by linguists. The main source is the pronounciation guides written by the romans themselves. They describe how to trill the R’s and how to say diphtongs etc, and compare latin pronounciation with the letters of other languages, mainly greek.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    When i got into monster hunter 4 ultimate(the one with a good story) i was told that Deviljho, a voracious monster that will eat anything mid combat to recover its stamina, will eat its own tail if you cut it. Everyone believed it, no one tried to capture it on camera because of the hardware limitation(no “clip that”, no shadowplay).

    Turn out, millions of Monster Hunter fans remembered wrong because it’s a hoax.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just found out that you can’t take someone’s lead in order to behave like they are behaving, you can only follow their lead.

    I thought that taking someone’s lead, “I’m taking their lead”, is an actual expression, while apparently it is not.

    • Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Taking someone’s lead sounds like a British saying indicating the opposite of following someone’s lead. It sounds like you’re taking someone’s leash in your hands and directing them where to go.

        • indun@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “Take the lead” is certainly an expression used in the UK to denote guiding people, as in “I’ll take the lead”. I assume both come from ballroom dancing.

          I’m sure it’s used elsewhere but it may also simply be a conflation of the two.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, taking the lead I think is a pretty common expression, meaning that you’ll take the initiative, but I’ve used " taking their lead" to mean that another person has taken the lead and someone else is following them.

            Which is apparently not real at all, but I only became aware of this because another Lemmy put up a TIL post that explained how they thought that was an expression and discovered after using it their entire life that it was not in any dictionary.

            Just like me

    • twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It may not be the original idiom, but it’s definitely something people say. If the core expressions are “(I) take the lead” and “(you) follow my lead,” that lends itself easily to a merge: you take my lead. It’s not as common as the originals but it’s definitely out there. It will stick around because it’s really easy to unambiguously infer what it means in context.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree that it’s used, I’m sure that if we looked in movie scripts or novels, we would find examples of that phrase, but I can’t find a single dictionary that agrees that the phrase is a legitimate phrase, and that’s what really boggled my mind.

        Boggled and boondoggled over here.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never heard that before and find it baffling.

      Bulbasaur comes out of the gate with two types.

      Charmander becomes Charizard with two types.

      The first (or second) non-starter you encounter is Pidgy with two types.

      The required Viridian Forest had Weedle with two types and if you only got a Caterpie, that becomes Butterfree who also has two types.

      The number of two type Pokemon that you can catch at the start of the game is massive. Probably about half?

    • RampageDon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ghost types are only weak to psychic in that game because they are poison types too. Ruined me for generations swearing psychic was super to ghost.

  • TheDarkestShark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Here’s one I just experienced, was watching Star Wars: A New Hope and my brother asked me if I remember C-3PO every having a silver leg. I told him no, hes always been all gold. Next scene we watched his right leg from the knee down was all silver. Like wtf never have I noticed that before, I said meh maybe it was a Lucas later edit. Revenge of the Sith comes on the TV next and C-3PO’s leg is so vibrantly silver that I could not even comprehend not noticing that contrast in past viewings.

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I only ever really noticed it in the desert scene after the escape pod, when he’s arguing with R2. It looks silver there, the rest of the time it looks gold. I think I probably assumed it was some video quality thing, either on my TV or that a lot of movies from that time period have weird quirky video. Like Logan’s Run was the year before Star Wars and if something gold sometimes looked silver, I wouldn’t really even notice, that’s just how a movie from the 70s looks.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I genuinely remembered there were 5 main characters in the Little Einsteins cast, even though there were only 4.

    I guess I was imagining random weirdness.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    None but I live in New Zealand and have met a lot of strange people online who think our geographic location has changed.

  • General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I could’ve sworn Jim Beam whiskey was Jim Bean. A friend of mine had a poster of a whiskey bottle on his wall that I stared at every time I was there. He was a minor at the time and didn’t drink, so I always wondered why he had it up. Years later I saw a Jim Beam bottle and had a Mandela moment. The Berenstein Bears and Mandela dying in jail were things I believed, too, but I think the whiskey one is one I haven’t heard from anybody else, yet.