On every thread or post, if you click on more and activity, you’ll get the info.

I personally find this to be a good things, I’ve seen people using downvote way too easily. I like the idea that we need to be somehow accountable for those mechanism.

edit: It could be somehow improved to have an option to let this info only available between concerned users.

edit edit: I think that up/downvote info shouldn’t be public, but kept private between the users involved. we need to address this privacy issue.

  • Sarcastyx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hard disagree on the idea that upvote/downvote history being displayed constantly is a good thing - it seems like it’s just inviting harassment. Should be opt-out at a minimum, and preferably opt-in.

      • Sarcastyx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is where I see there being an issue as well.

        There’s also potential for harassment due to people seeing opposing political opinions. As an example - My wife was once the target of harassment by a number of users on Reddit for days for warning people about an anti-abortion protest that was displaying graphic imagery. Much easier for those kind of people to coordinate harassment of others if they can easily see records of upvoting pro-choice or downvoting anti-choice posts/comments.

  • PabloDiscobar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some people don’t understand the implications of making the votes public.

    Any tool like “Kbin enhancement suite” will quickly scan for who downvoted you and will allow you to track the person who disrespected you by downvoting you. It won’t be “micro-harassement”, it will be wide scale, automated harassment, systematic retaliation. An active hate list, basically. Imagine the equivalent of a “the_donald” centralizing a database of the people to downvote or harass based on their public vote.

    I think the best course of action is to no vote at all as long as the votes are not secret.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Public voting is inherent in how the fediverse is structured, it’s impossible for it to both allow upvotes/downvotes and also keep those votes secret. A particular instance could hide them from the interface but any other instance that was federated with it would be able to see them anyway so if you’re worried about stalkers then that’s not going to change anything.

      About the only way I could think of do “solve” this would be to use a pretty sophisticated cryptography technique called zero-knowledge proofs, and given how many people are already having problems with the complexities of federation that’s probably not a good path to follow right now.

  • awfulsystems@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    my god, the most exhausting people online are gonna love this

    can’t wait to get harassed cause I won’t dEbAtE why I clicked the “your post is garbage” button and cite sources that aren’t my eyes or rising bile

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I had a friend once who was seemingly unaware that Instagram made all his likes public. It was entertaining enough, but maybe not ideal from his perspective. It felt like I ended up knowing him a little better than I really wanted to.

  • jake_eric@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hmm, yeah, I don’t like this at all. I can see some benefits but I really don’t want to have to worry about what I’m voting on. If I downvote some lunatic I don’t want them being able to harass me about it. And it feels way too social-media-y for me. This could be a dealbreaker for a lot of people if there isn’t at least a way to opt out.

    • workinkindofhard@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree on all points especially about the social media feel. I don’t want instagram or facebook where it shows so and so liked/disliked/reacted to something.

      • Protahgonist@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think this forces something that nobody paid attention to in Reddiquete, which was that if you don’t like something, you just shouldn’t vote on it. Downvotes were supposed to be for when something actively didn’t belong, not just something you didn’t agree with. Of course, another way to do that would be to just get rid of the Reduce button entirely.

        • jake_eric@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mainly used downvotes on trolls and other bad-faith comments, people just being purposefully annoying in the comments. Exactly the kind of people I don’t want to engage with, just downvote and move on.

    • kjr@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      @jake_eric I see the opposite. Making votes and especially downvotes private facilitates a kind of micro-harassement by individuals or organized groups.

      @aroom

      • jake_eric@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I see where you’re coming from, but on the flip side, I think it empowers the bad-faith trolls who have way too much time and energy to get into fights. On Reddit, if I see someone just being a general asshole, I’ll downvote and move on. If that person can see that I’ve done that, I’m not gonna feel as comfortable doing that, lest they retaliate somehow.

        You could turn it around and say that it empowers non-asshole users to fight back as well, but the assholes tend to have more energy to get into fights, that’s part of the reason why they’re being assholes online in the first place.

        I can tell you I’ve absolutely never wished Reddit votes were shared knowledge. Even if it would occasionally be useful information, it’s just not worth it for me.

    • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The fediverse is always ahead on things like moderation, so I don’t forsee downvote harassers becoming a thing here. Eventually, you’ll be able to easily block/report/ban them.

      I’m not even sure allowing an opt out would be technically feasible without some big work. Your votes have to be sent to other servers to keep counts consistent and you can’t control whether that server shows or hides votes. So any option you set on your own instance won’t have an effect outside your instance.

      Apart from the issue of harassers, I don’t see a good reason for hiding votes. Showing votes might help prevent brigades or similar vote harassment (e.g. user always downvotes another user they don’t like).

      • jake_eric@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m still figuring out how this works. Does Lemmy also make your votes public? It doesn’t seem to me like it does (though I may be wrong) and that’s part of the fediverse too, no?

        • 0x1C3B00DA@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t see anywhere in the lemmy UI where you can see votes, but I’m sure there’s ways to get the votes through the API.
          So maybe the solution is don’t worry about votes being technically public but hide them from the UI, but I don’t think even that solution is required.

          • jake_eric@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Well, I’m sure Reddit tracked who voted on what behind the scenes too, sites have to or else you can just vote multiple times on multiple devices/apps/browsers. I’m not worried about that really, since it’s unavoidable. Making them public is my issue.

            • Cavalarrr@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think the point is for the votes to be federated, the instance has to know who has actually voted. The issue being that information is then on the instance the post is hosting, and due to how posts propagate, there’s nothing stopping another instance putting who voted on what front and center, and just pulling that data from the host instance.

              • jake_eric@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Ah, I see the point there. That a new instance with a different UI could put them up.

                I’m certainly no tech expert, but if it’s about the API, then how did third-party Reddit apps work with it? The votes definitely synced between different versions of Reddit, could a third-party Reddit app have been made that showed votes publicly? If not, what was the system behind that, and could it work here? Again, no idea, there may be a very good reason why what I’m thinking wouldn’t work, but I dunno what it would be.

                • Cavalarrr@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I’m far from an expert on this sort of thing, but I would wager that the only voting data available through Reddit’s API is the current number of up and downvotes, the overall vote score, and whether the account requesting the information has up or down voted, for any given post / comment.
                  It can do that because the data is centralised, and every account exists in one place, whereas federation has to say “[email protected] upvoted this comment, and so did [email protected]”, because there’s nowhere to store that data centrally, other than the post itself.

  • eatmoregreenfood@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I understand what you’re saying, but in the broader scheme of the internet we should have the ability to dictate what of our data and actions get broadcast and therefore able to be mined by advertisers or other nefarious entities. This is actually a hugely important idea in fighting the corporatization of the internet. We need to stop letting mega corps build profiles on us based on our clicks.

    • aroom@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I totally agree, but I find it refreshing to make people accountable. Maybe there is a solution to keep it somehow private between users?

      • eatmoregreenfood@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I still don’t really understand what your dissatisfied with. You said something about people downvoting too much? Say you see someone who is downvoting in a way you don’t like. What is your recourse? Why do you want that information?

        • aroom@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If I see someone downvoting all my thread or post, I’ll block them. Anonymity is not always bringing the best out of people.

          • Cavalarrr@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            People are allowed to disagree with things, although I understand if someone is just spamming the entirety of a thread with downvotes for no appreciable reason.
            I’m in agreement with @eatmoregreenfood, that displaying your votes should be opt in, if available on the front end at all.
            On a social basis, I don’t think it matters; Whilst it would be preferable that someone explains why they disagree with something (assuming it is actually a disagreement, and not just malicious), I don’t think anyone should be fearful of downvoting because the OP might call them out on it and expect them to explain, or forever see nothing from that user again. Disagreement isn’t inherently negative.

            • aroom@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m sorry but we talked about silly things being posted in an other thread, we exchanged our point of view and at the end, you literally downvoted all of my silly intervention in the thread. so you do you but that is exactly this kind of behaviour I’m not looking forward here.

              you could also argue that it would be a shame that anyone feels fearful to post because of people downvoting whatever it not pleasing them.

              for me downvoting is a strong statement, not to be taken lightly. it can be part of building an very unwelcoming environment and also shaping the discours of users in only one direction.

              please let’s try to take what’s the best of the fediverse here as well, be kind with each other if not excellent.

              • deaconblue@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                And your post is currently up to 17 downvotes. Seems like people pretty much proved the point you were making. I think that is kinda sad, but not entirely unpredictable. I’m still new here. I used reddit, sometimes I really liked it. But it wasn’t perfect. I see this as a chance to improve. If we want to. I agree with what you said, I don’t very often downvote. We will see what happens.

              • Cavalarrr@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Myself, and a handful of users by the looks of it, disagreed with the content of some of your posts, or thought it wasn’t relevant / contributing to the discussion. I certainly didn’t downvote the entirety of your contribution to that thread, and I don’t intend for you to think it’s a personal attack.

                If you’d like to have a discourse on why I downvoted 4 of your comments, I, like many others aren’t looking for the ‘redditification’ of another site, regardless of how similar the premise might be, and that’s what I felt those comments were promoting, particularly ‘gesundheit’. I understand wanting things to be ‘just as good as they were’, etc., but this is new, things can be better, and I personally don’t want to see the site become reddit 2.0 just because there’s been a big influx of users after the blackout started. You’re entitled to want kbin.social to become something else, of course, and that’s arguably what the voting system is there for.

                • aroom@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  you shouldn’t assume that much about my intention tho. and I rather talk to you and argue that being told to “shut if up”, even tho you didn’t say it, it’s how a downvote feels.

                  I certainly don’t want kbin to be a reddit 2.0. but id like people to feel free to express themself in all matter, not only being serious. We don’t have to agree about that, it’s ok. But one thing that I really wish would stay on reddit is this downvote culture.

    • Nepenthe@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You have a pretty ironclad point. A company having access to years of that from any user would be a huge boon. Which is upsetting, because I viewed it as a helpful development in terms of group dynamics. Not for blacklisting purposes, which they also run the risk of turning into, but because, knowing your name is up there, you’re more likely to mull over whether something is really actually bad enough to deserve the downvote and throwing them around willy-nilly is a great habit to break yourself of.

      If you can’t downvote something without being called out by name, you’re stuck admitting it really didn’t matter all that much, or hopefully explaining why you dislike something in words. Which does not happen nearly as often as it should. Forcing people to own up to them could curb the tendency to downvote things into oblivion

      Thinking it over, I’m forced to admit the cons outweigh it, but I don’t have to like it.

      • IncognitoErgoSum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If that company can’t serve ads to you or connect you to a profile of a real person, then I’m not sure it really matters.

      • effingjoe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        A company having access to years of that from any user would be a huge boon.

        This could be said for any bit of information you post publicly. You don’t think they can learn the same info from your posts? I agree it is a problem but I don’t think private up/down votes address it.

        • Braggston08@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Im doing (“did”) a lot more of up/downvoting than writing longer replys to different topics.
          It should be much easier for a company to scan a wide array of users on their voting behaviour than reading their posts one by one.

            • Braggston08@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              maybe i didnt express correct what i mean…

              Lets say after 5 years of kbin running and lots of user interactions.
              -It should be really easy to pick out 50 or 100 (for example politcal) threads and filter all the up and downvotes. After that you could identify for most of the users which direction they are leaning.
              -in the same scenario its much more work to read (or train a AI or bot or something)all the posts to interpret what point of view all these users have.

              • effingjoe@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think you underestimate how easy it is to determine the “mood” of a comment, but let me perhaps come at this from a different angle: even if kbin did as you request and made up/down votes hidden, there is nothing that says a server that is federated with kbin has to hide that information, as well.

                It’s probably best to just assume that any information you give in public will be public, and act accordingly.

                • Braggston08@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Huh thats scary.
                  Im honestly not that deep into the AI theme so im not really able to recognise which of all this AI things are real and which are more wishfull thinking or marketing.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Its fediverse. The only way to verify upvotes and downvotes and limit them to 1 per user is for there to be a record. The only way to avoid that situation is to not Federate upvotes/downvotes.

    Being concerned about boosts is literally a misunderstanding of what a boost is. The purpose of a boost is to mimic retweet functionality. It’s to share that same thing with all of your followers. It would serve no purpose if it weren’t public.

    One platform can hide them, but others would still be able to see them so someone with bad intentions could still just look it up somewhere else

    • Mounticat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ah, yeah. That makes me want the ability to undo a boost or have a confirmation for boosts even more.

      • aroom@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        you can undo a boost by clicking on it a seconde time, no? and you’ll have a confirmation with the term boost being underscored

  • Travisty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it’s a good thing to show the person behind the downvote based on the principles of transparency and sharing information freely. If corporations will take advantage of that data, they are the problem and the solution should reflect that.

    If a person wants to participate in the discussion by either commenting or voting, they shouldn’t be doing it behind a veil of anonymity.

  • mykl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oof. It feels like every new social media platform insists on replicating the mistakes of their predecessors. You’d think by now there would be an established body of design patterns for social media. This looks like it might be relevant, even though it’s quite old now.

    edit: it’s also interesting that only downvotes count for “reputation points”, so anyone who raises their heads above the parapet in a contentious thread is at risk of instantly having a negative reputation [edit 2: QED]. I have no idea what effect that will have though…

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      kbin does let you hide your own followings and magazine subscriptions, so my guess is it wouldn’t be hard to implement hiding your up/downvotes. Ernest the developer is almost certainly more concerned with handling site traffic and stability first, but you could always add an Issue to the bug tracker.

    • zeste@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I read on here somewhere a day ago that boosts count positively to your reputation.

      • mykl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hypothesis confirmed by experiment. Enjoy the boost.

        So basically a boost acts like a “super-upvote” (in addition to acting like a share). Man, this is going to be interesting.

        EDIT: See replies below for more details.

        • Fatalchemist@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is this how boost is intended or just part of the broken system while things get under control?

          I know like on mastodon, boost is basically retooting. Would me boosting something show somewhere on my profile? I guess I can look at your profile after this and see if the boost shows up on yours lol.

          • aroom@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            in kbin, boosts and upvotes are like boosts and favorites in mastodon/calckey. but in here, boosts also ranking up the thread in the top category.

            the reputation point is broken tho, because the mechanism behind boost and upvote have been modified/switched a few days ago, but the reputation point code not updated yet.

            • Neato@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              New to kbin and don’t use Mastodon yet. If a boost is a super-upvote, why wouldn’t you boost everything when you voted it up?

              Edit: found the FAQ: boosts are sent to followers in timeline/feed.

              • aroom@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                boosts are like retweet. it improves the visibility of a thread. it’s like sharing it with all your followers + promoting it to the top category.

                I boost content that I want to be seen. I upvote content as a kind gesture for the author. I downvote content that is really not appropriate but just not enough to be reported.

    • ed2417@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I managed to garner a negative reputation score through one satirical link. I am not motivated to post more at this point honestly.