![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Seconding Ahmad Tea, I’m impressed by how cost effective they are.
Seconding Ahmad Tea, I’m impressed by how cost effective they are.
Same thing that happened to the Chinese creators on Youtube despite it being banned in China, I presume.
Occasionally, the SCMP posts something like this, where the title seems to support a non-CCP viewpoint. If you read the content of the article, however, it merely reiterates the reasons the CCP claim the South China Sea.
What’s the word for something in the middle? Tepid?
These are all strategies that have already been adopted in China, they will block it like everything else.
Why not use the English word for an entity that resides in the USA: American?
I think that statement would be true if we solved scarcity, perhaps.
Do you not want to find out how the game ends? I think I get it, though, since I’d just make up endings I preferred for books with endings I didn’t like.
The impact as of right now is that everyone thinks they’re being absolute assholes about it.
If it’s a small but loud group of people on the internet, can’t we just do what we’ve always done and ignore them?
I don’t understand, the CCP has stated multiple times that sanctions has had multiple beneficial effects on Chinese firms such as Huawei, causing them to become more independent and effective in the face of adversity. Why stop now?
According to China’s Coast Guard, Manila’s ship had deliberately and dangerously approached a Chinese vessel in an unprofessional manner, forcing it to take control measures, including “boarding inspections and forced evictions.”
Oh no! An inflatable boat has approached our large, well equipped vessel! Quickly, we must forcefully board this boat even though it is “dangerous and deliberate,” and chop off their fingers! Then we will puncture their boat with our swords, that will show them!
I always buy Christmas cake after Christmas, it’s a steal.
You should try your hand at writing short stories.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, perhaps they are trying to stay neutral by publishing articles from various points of view, including the CCP’s.
I had to double check when reading the article that this was indeed published by the Economist, particularly after this line:
As a private firm whose goals dovetail neatly with those of the Chinese government, it is becoming a model for how China thinks about innovation.
How do they know this, besides perhaps an official from the CCP making a statement about it?
The current version of the OS has been built with open-source Android code to make Android apps compatible for the time being. It is designed to be used in all Huawei’s consumer products, including watches, televisions and vehicle systems, which makes it possible to integrate functions across devices. It is said to have 700m users and 2.2m developers.
The next version of Harmony is expected to drop all Android-linked code.
Harmony OS is an Android fork. Dropping all Android-linked code in an Android fork means removing almost all its code. I’m curious to know if Huawei have indeed developed their own OS, like Samsung’s Bada, and if it really contains no trace of Android.
The picture says “No Smartphones Allowed.” Doesn’t seem entirely right…
Tariffs are the most straightforward way to deal with dumping. Hard to fault the EU for this approach.
Sounds to me like we’ve solved scarcity. Excellent.