In the US, you would be called a liberal.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21534416/free-state-project-new-hampshire-libertarians-matthew-hongoltz-hetling

I will never understand that version of what you’re talking about. They should just buy out some land and build their own town, but watch out for bears.

Thanks for explaining, I think I understand how I feel about things better now too.

It’s kind of like when the UK says fanny, they mean vagina and the US means butt. It does and will cause misinformation to thrive. Just because we have 2 different meanings, that doesn’t mean either is wrong.

That’s not what I mean, I know you will get it. But US politics has a lot of misinformation going on, mixing up terms the US uses for certain things can make the misinformation thrive. In US terms, you sound like a liberal. You don’t want a nanny state, you want a government owned by the people.

So you’re not in the US? Confusing the terms makes it harder for the US, but probably easier for others ig.

but DOES believe in rules and various degrees of enforcement to defend the powerless from the powerful.

So, kind of a soft government? What about roads and utilities? What really turns me off of libertarian is the belief that people have to pay for their own roads and fireman. The rich will only survive then, kind of like how our healthcare is right now. But if you’re saying that the government is ran more like a co-op, then I get it.

I have never heard of a Left-libertarian, what are your libertarian views?

I think what a lot of people are saying is that they do both, exploit their customers and their workers.

It didn’t feel like they were stable and would take care of us though, the nuclear drills sure didn’t help. Also, I know a lot of army vets that weren’t drafted but went to school with the army bill. There are people out there that still know that war sucks. Also, the kids now have school shooting drills, they kind of live with the potential of war and some have seen it. There does seem to be an incredible breakdown with the money in politics, no shame and we’re extremely close to having a dictator after they attempted a coup, I’ll give you that.

I can agree with that, but being authentic definitely helps the conversations take off.

It has to be authentic, you can’t just comment to comment.

Double edged sword, them firing him will probably release him from his contracts so he can pursue that money train.

There are people doing it DIY, https://www.motherearthnews.com/sustainable-living/renewable-energy/diy-wind-turbine-zm0z17amz/?slideshow=1#axzz36yyyMynI

https://www.instructables.com/How-To-Build-A-wind-Turbine-From-Recycled-Scrap-Me/

Research Fukishima, Chernobyl, 3 mile island and the submarine leaking and get back to me, lol.

The nuclear bro admitted nuclear is expensive to build, cities and towns could help with the costs, it would build jobs and it’s been tested for decades. I remember being a kid and hearing about celebrities putting in solar panels and it being cost effective in about 5 years.

I’ve known someone who put up a small wind turbine and they had a battery bank. It was super simple and worked np. I’m not sure of what you’re saying.

Why is that the alternative?

If we can send a robot to mars, we can build personal renewables right now. Why won’t you nuclear bros address that?

Cons: expensive, special waste management is required.

special waste management is doing a lot of heavy lifting, yeah? Meaning, we are leaving nuclear waste to future generations.

As far as renewables cons, we just stayed at home for 2 years and we adjusted. Not having enough power and more power failures isn’t such a bad trade-off. Start spending your time on getting renewables in every household. Public and private utilities need to adjust to people taking back their power.