• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    To date, nobody has shown a more effective approach to organizing that I’m aware of. All the successful movements follow roughly the same formula. The nature of society has not fundamentally changed in a century, so there’s no reason to think that methods of organization need to drastically change as well. Just look at MAS in Bolivia as a very recent example.

    • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      To date, nobody has shown a more effective approach to organizing that I’m aware of.

      Makhnovshchina, CNT, Rojava, Zapatistas…

      Is your definition of success the establishment of a socialist state? Because anarchists are never going to do that.

      The nature of society has not fundamentally changed in a century

      You don’t actually believe that basically nothing has changed since before the industrial revolution, do you? That seems intentionally obtuse.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Is your definition of success the establishment of a socialist state? Because anarchists are never going to do that.

        My definition is the ability to defend the revolution and prevent a counter revolution. Marxists have been able to do this, but Anarchists have not. Incidentally, Zapatistas have actually started creating more central system now as well. Anarchists are free to demonstrate a working alternative to that though.

        You don’t actually believe that basically nothing has changed since before the industrial revolution, do you? That seems intentionally obtuse.

        You can’t actually address what I said without making a straw man can you?