Summary

Low-income voters who supported Donald Trump are expressing concerns over potential cuts to government benefits as his administration pushes for aggressive spending reductions.

Trump’s newly announced “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, is tasked with cutting programs, raising fears about impacts on social safety nets.

Trump also plans to shut down the Education Department, impose tariffs on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada, and has nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Health Secretary, signaling a focus on controversial health policies.

Voter anxieties about these shifts are growing.

Non-paywall link

  • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    12 days ago

    “He’s not going to hurt the poor. He’s too smart for that.

    Oh, you infuriating fucking summer child. It’d be hilarious if I wasn’t stuck in this hellbound handbasket with the rest of you fucking mongoloids.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      12 days ago

      That’s their logic … they weren’t thinking “He’s not going to hurt the poor” …

      They were thinking “He’s not going to hurt ME! He’s going to hurt other people I don’t like.”

      • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’ve actually heard Maga people admit they’ll get hurt by these policies, but immigrants and homos will get hurt MOAR!, y’know, like Jesus taught, so it’s cool.

    • bitwise@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      A friendly reminder that “mongoloid” is a racist pejorative, and that the government of Mongolia literally ran a campaign decades ago to get people to stop doing it.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      See…I don’t look at it that way. It’s not funny to me, even if I weren’t affected.

      It’s like watching a blind kitten running into a house that’s on fire. I don’t laugh at the soon to be burning kitten. I cry for the suffering that’s about to take place.

      Yes, the kitten chose to run into a burning house. Yes the kitten SHOULD HAVE known that’s a bad idea.

      …but they didn’t. They didn’t know what they were truely doing. And now it’s time to suffer from the obvious bad situation you just ran into.

      Only difference is, the kitten fire is now affecting the whole country.

      • WatDabney@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeeeeaah… but see, your analogy not coincidentally fails, since the kitten is just ignorant.

        It would be more accurate if the kitten ran into the burning house because some fat, smelly old tom told it that if it did, the tom and his buddies would destroy the lives of everyone the kitten hates.

        So yeah - there’s a lot of ignorance there, but the foundation that makes that ignorance relevant and effective is bigotry and hatred and an utter and complete lack of empathy or integrity. If the kitten wasn’t so blinded by its hatred and cruelty, “run into this burning house to destroy someone else’s life” wouldn’t have been an effective appeal.

        • WastingCommentSpace@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I have so many questions. Does the kitten understand what fire is? Does the kitten understand human language? Also because the kitten is blind are we sure it knowlingly went into the fire? If it doesnt understand what a fire is and cant see it. It only can smell and hear the fire and taste or touch (which would be bad, im fairly certain but im not an expert) did it have an experience with fire before and thats why its blind and knowlingly went in the fire?

      • GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 days ago

        That’s a bad analogy. In this situation, the kittens voted to set the house in fire because there’s a puppy in a different room that they don’t like and it will get burned too. It’s hateful, willful ignorance and a desire to hurt others.

    • jeansburger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      12 days ago

      I hate how this is always on fucking point. These people don’t have empathy until it affects them in a personal way, then all of a sudden it’s “who let this happen?!”

      It was you, you fucking dipshits, by not having the emotional intelligence to be able to think for one second in another person’s shoes or think out the end conclusion to a piece of rhetoric.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Also, killing Mexicans and Palestinians is still fine. They’re just worried about their benefits.

      I don’t fully blame them. Our systems of news in this country are so bad that you can’t hold them responsible, because they’re in no way fully aware of what a nightmare Trump is going to be. But if their benefits is what wakes them up, with no other change happening in the news landscape, them fuck them and they deserve it.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        12 days ago

        you can’t hold them responsible, because they’re in no way fully aware of what a nightmare Trump is going to be

        if people choose to ignore what’s right in front of their face, that’s a choice they made, and are 100% responsible for. i hold them entirely responsible for being so willfully ignorant and motivated by pure hate. i wouldn’t give a shit if their kindergarten-tier irresponsibility didn’t affect everyone and not just them

        • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          12 days ago

          I can’t count how many times I saw posts on my Facebook feed that said things like “If you or a loved one relies on Social Security be careful who you vote for”. Knowing the people who posted I know they are Trump supporters. I guarantee that when benefits get cut they’ll find some way to blame it on Biden/Harris/Pelosi, etc. They either don’t see it or refuse to see it. Likewise the number of people in my life who expect an economic miracle by the end of February is unbelievable.

        • enkers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          I think it’s best to only assign responsibility where it’s due. People can’t just flip a switch and have the education system and their peers no longer be a part of the problem. We’re not going to address systemic issues by only acknowledging individual’s responsibility, especially when they’re part of a system that promotes ignorance.

          That said, individuals still do have agency, so they’re certainly not blameless either. But to hold them fully responsible seems counterproductive.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    11 days ago

    “He is more attuned to the needs of everyone instead of just the rich,” Mosura, 55, said on a recent afternoon. “I think he knows it’s the poor people that got him elected, so I think Trump is going to do more to help us.”

    Oh. My. God.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Low income voters who supported Trump deserve what he does to them.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 days ago

        Some people are more concerned about punishing the people they don’t think deserve things that they’ll let themselves get caught up in the same bullshit.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 days ago

    Voter anxieties about these shifts are growing.

    Oh, NOW they’re concerned? Not when we were all beating the drum telling these morons that Trump was going to fuck the country again?

    God.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yes but what about the trans people? Surely it will be worth losing their food stamps and Healthcare to ensure that trans people suffer, for some reason.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 days ago

    Low income voters should demand taxing the wealthy, like multimillionaires and billionaires, more rather than just hoping for benefits

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    11 days ago

    I wish I could offer them some solace, but I can’t. They are absolutely fucked. We are all fucked. This is going to take decades to recover from, and that’s assuming we even can.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    All well and good to admire the leopard feast, but I’m worried about the fact that once these people are down and out, society is going to have to collectively carry them one way or another.

    It’s concerning that many people near the edge will fall off it, regardless of their voting position.

    It’s obviously concerning that since republican policy will be enacted, more will solely be covered via emergency services rather than collective safety nets, which is an overall cost increase to society.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      At this point, I’m convinced it’s just a matter of regulating food

      Every major revolution in history was more or less sparked and accelerated because people were starving. And when you have the choice of starving to death or doing something, anything, then most people will opt for action rather than dying.

      So as long as you keep people fed … you can abuse them, manipulate them, treat them with no respect and take away everything from them and the majority of them won’t do a thing … take away their food however, and they’ll lash out like a wild animal.

      This also doesn’t mean that you keep people well fed … it just means keeping enough food in their grasp to keep them from revolting.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        If they fail to provide food, I think there’s a chance a significant enough chunk of people would learn that the right will not help them no matter what. Perhaps that would be enough to crack the fucking propaganda.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Nah they’ll keep them fed enough. If they’re really smart they’ll increase SNAP/WIC spending. It would be a paltry amount compared to what we’ll lose from the rich tax breaks and the deportation fiasco.

          Although on the other hand that could lose them votes among the working poor who don’t have to worry about starving but do, in their heart of hearts, want the bad people to starve.

          I think the only way for people to see differently is if the threatened tariffs are put in place and we see the worst inflation in the country’s history over the next two years. Then maybe we can get some actual progressives in Congress (unfortunately under the Democrat umbrella) to stem the tide of insanity.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            I think the only way for people to see differently is if the threatened tariffs are put in place and we see the worst inflation in the country’s history over the next two years. Then maybe we can get some actual progressives in Congress (unfortunately under the Democrat umbrella) to stem the tide of insanity.

            I can see that happening. I don’t know if it’ll result in a proper progressive wave though. Or instead just more of the same. If people got so fucked by conservatives to turn away from them, they would be incentivised to vote for anything but conservatives. That lets the Democrats win with establishment candidates. I think a shift in the Democratic party is more likely in the in-between period, when things haven’t gotten too dire for people yet.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        To the downvotes:

        I completely acknowledge that right wing policy is the problem here, and these people brought it about. If anyone deserves consequences, it should be those that actively brought them about.

        I am not sympathetic for leopard chew toys, I’m sympathetic for society which has no option but to accommodate them.