I’m relatively new to the linux space, I was introduced by the steam deck which uses kde, and it’s pretty similar to windows in terms of how it works so that’s the DE i’d be leaning towards when I eventually switch. I’ve never used gnome so i’m not sure if it’d be worth using I guess?

So I’m just looking for some input from the community, do you use Gnome or Plasma, why do you use it, and what’s kind of like a pros and cons kinda thing between the two?

        • _donnadie_@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Nah I’m more into the main distros, they tend to have better support. Debian, Fedora are my main OSs, with Debian being what I use with old hardware that I still want to use on a daily basis, and Fedora for anything that’s new and might require a more up to date kernel.

    • bpt11@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I didn’t know it existed till making this post, as someone that’s new those are just the only two I hear about.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 days ago

    KDE if these are my choices & by a long shot.

    I usually cobble together my own tiling setup. This has less bloat, but also a lot less integration.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    Plasma.

    As a Linux convert from Windows, IMO it’s really close in look and feel to Windows 7 or 10 but with none of the bullshit. You barely have to change your workflow if you’re already used to Windows.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I use GNOME. KDE is nice in that it allows you to customize everything, but if I want that degree of control I’d rather use a fully customized window manager setup (sway is generally my go-to).

    GNOME is also designed to be used in a keyboard-centric workflow, which I prefer. It’s a nice comfy default for when I want the option to use my computer “lazily”, i.e. just kicking back mostly using the mouse to browse the web, but still has enough power-user functionality to make zipping around without touching the mouse feel good.

    I also just like their defaults a lot. If you start to install a bunch of third party extensions etc it starts to get messy and degrade the point of the whole unified vision, and at that point you’re better off with KDE IMO.

    It’s also worth noting that I don’t really like the default Mac OS UX – while I can see why people say “KDE is like Windows, GNOME is like Mac,” it’s really only a surface level comparison that mostly ends at “KDE uses a taskbar and GNOME has a dock”.

    • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Gnome is so much more different, the closest comparison would be android but android is frankly a downgrade of gnome for me with how slow and clunky it is even with touch controls funnily enough

  • WereCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I just like GNOME better. Especially on a laptop. KDE is technically better on a desktop but all the things that annoy me on KDE tip the scales enough for me to use GNOME instead.

    • richardisaguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      after changing animation speed in KDE i have never managed to get back to gnome, holy cow does my computer feels responsive

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Gnome

    I used to use KDE but I tried gnome and the default settings is exactly what I want anyway so I just switched

    Would put gnome in my phone if I could but android itself already acts similar enough, but switching between apps is such a damn pain why is this such a pain god just be fast for once android

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    KDE for best fully integrated, out of box, modern DE.

    XFCE + Compiz if you’re running on lower end hardware (uses less ram and utilizes gpu better). Also if you want even more customization than KDE with the drawback of limited SVG support (and still on X11 if that matters for you)

    GNOME if you hate yourself and want to use a knockoff of ChromeOS or Mac.

    Cinnamon and MATE if you want to see when GNOME used to be good.

    LXQt is the XFCE equivalent of KDE, but is now on wayland with GPU accel, so it can fit the same area as XFCE+Compiz.

    Wayfire (compositor) basically Compiz for Wayland if you want all the fancy effects on anything that uses wayland.

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    I settled with Plasma. It has its fair share of issues, mostly minor things compared to coming from Windows and its environment. But you really can customize it the way you want and it’s relatively comfortable, so I’m fine with it. I still miss the old KDE3, but I’m not that hardcore to use Trinity. Not even sure how’s Trinity nowadays.

    Gnome 3 is just not my world, at all… at least, for desktop. I kinda use it on my htpc if I need an environment. That, or Xfce. I can imagine on a palmtop pc or other portable device that runs Linux, either with or without a touchscreen Gnome could be a pretty decent choice. Also, I’m sure I could/would get used to it if there’s nothing else, but there are other options so I’m not going to sit down and get to (re)know Gnome, tho it’s not like I’m against it.

  • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Gnome ftw

    KDE Plasma is really nice, I love all the settings. But every time I try it, I give up after a couple weeks because I get annoyed at the hangups/crashes. Maybe because I’m always on old hardware. But I’ve never had Gnome crash. In 2 weeks, I had to ctrl-alt-f2 to reset plasma like 5 times. I never had to do that with gnome.

    Sometimes on Gnome I really wish I could change a setting that would be easy in Plasma. but it’s just not worth the hiccups. And it’s nice that Plasma gives access to a bunch of different task switchers. But I couldn’t find any that work as well as the Gnome task switcher. Plasma feels like beta testing

    ❤️ to KDE, though. I love K3b, KDEconnect (plus the GSconnect gnome extension), kate, krita, etc.

  • downhomechunk@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    I was on xfce for a long time due to having low power hardware. I got a decent computer around the time kde plasma came out. I tried it and have stayed on it.

    I hate gnome with every fiber of my being.