• Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wayland is still too immature. I couldn’t get it to work on my Kubuntu distro.

    And then there’s this list of problems with Wayland.

    https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277

    BEGIN RANT

    “Move fast and break things” may be fine for software gurus who love to experiment and have no problem hitting their head against the wall every few days while believing in the promise of a free-to-fix future, but this isn’t true for poor or busy people who are NOT middle class folks living in their own house in a suburb with a garage full of computer parts. There are single parents, caregivers with disabled and/or elderly, folks who need a reliable computer for their studies, and in general people who simply need something that JUST WORKS.

    I’m a caregiver, and unfortunate I’m poor enough that I don’t have money to buy a commercial OS. Heck, I wish Windows just worked instead of making old versions obsolete. I was perfectly fine with Windows 7 ten years ago until Microsoft started doing planned obsolescence bullshit with their forced updates. I had to switch to Linux because Windows became very unreliable and I needed a stable platform that wouldn’t ruin my work.

    (So if you’re one of the persons who reply to “Help my Linux is having problems” with “well you should know Linux is like that, you should have thought it twice before switching”, then you’re part of the problem because that’s a very, very shitty answer to give to a non technical end user with limited time and resources)

    The year of the Linux desktop will never arrive if developers keep pushing incomplete and buggy software to the end users instead of actually fixing bugs and delivering their stuff ONLY when they’re ready.

    Wayland is NOT ready for the end user.

    END RANT.

          • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Ah yes, end users have no right to point out a software’s flaws unless they’re better than the developers who made it.

            Don’t tell me you forgot what a “non technical end user” is?

            Users can’t even add a feature request because they’re met with a storm of insults and snobbery.

            Well, I have some news for you: You can’t hope for the year of the Linux desktop and keep treating end users like shit.

            • onlinepersona@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Pointing out flaws is fine. Shitting on devs, is not, just like devs shitting on users isn’t.

              Don’t be surprised if you attack somebody and they defend themselves.

              Saying “X doesn’t work” is completely fine. Writing a rant about how opensource devs don’t think about people, yadayada. Buddy, these are people giving up their free time to write stuff. Nobody’s forcing you to use it. There are no guarantees provided, no warranties either. It’s provided as is.

              The way you are is as if someone built a free house in the woods, you showed up and complained about how the door is creaky, the toilet leaky, a draft coming through the windows, and you wrote a review online disparaging the free work. Does that sound like good behavior to you?

              Users can’t even add a feature request because they’re met with a storm of insults and snobbery.

              How did you write the feature request? “I demand this be implemented because you’re providing a product and I’m a customer” or “It would be great if X were added for reason Y”? If it’s the latter and you were met with unkindness, of course that’s shit, no doubt.

              CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

              • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                I understand devs being busy. What I can’t stand is their fan club who keep shitting on every user asking questions or not having the time to do a deep search on every single solution and the problems that come with it.

                Maybe this is news for you, but FOSS communities are incredibly toxic. Every single suggestion or legitimate complaint is taken as a personal attack.

                Then they wonder why people don’t pay enough attention to Linux and Open Source Software in general.

                Perhaps they should realize there’s too many assholes in the community who keep driving people away. Normal folks have a limit. They just leave and hope their Windows doesn’t crash away, which is less frustrating than having to personally deal not only with tech issues but the shitty attitude of peple who are knowledgeable enough.

                Worse, when you want to point out a flaw, you need to build an exhaustive list of reddit posts, archive org pages and so on and face trial because unless you give every single piece of evidence then your complaint is invalid. And I’m sorry but normal people just don’t have time for this shit.

                Remember that joke? Ask for help and you get no response; Say linux sucks because you can’t do X and you get dozens of apologetic posts explaining step by step how to do stuff.

                Turns out there’s some truth behind that joke.

                • onlinepersona@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  So there are two points:

                  1. don’t shit on people who donate their free time to make a product you can use for free with no warranty whatsoever, unless they treat you like shit
                  2. many FOSS communities are toxic: I wholeheartedly agree. Fuck those that are. Ain’t nobody got time for that.

                  Still point 2 does not invalidate point 1.

                  I’ve had to deal with toxic ubuntu, debian, arch, nixos, rust, java, python, … communities. The ones that piss me off the most are linux communities that treat newcomers like gutter-filth, refuse to endorse GUIs, good documentation, and just a generally better newcomer experience, then wonder why there’s no “year of the linux desktop”. I hate those gatekeepers with a passion. “If you use Linux, you must learn to use the command line”, no how about you fuck off to whatever CLI cave you came from and learn to be a productive member of the community?

                  As I said, I get it. But again, writing an angry bug report, demanding a new feature be implemented, writing a tirade about “how bad opensource software is” or whatever? Nah. Not OK

                  Remember that joke? Ask for help and you get no response; Say linux sucks because you can’t do X and you get dozens of apologetic posts explaining step by step how to do stuff.

                  Turns out there’s some truth behind that joke.

                  Sad but true.

                  CC BY-NC-SA 4.0