Whether you, like me, beleive that QAZWSX keyboards make far more sense, especially in a machine learning world, I think we all agree a layout designed to circumvent jamming typewriter keys doesn’t make sense in modern society on modern devices.

  • DrCake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have enough difficulty when a UI decides to use abc layout, no way would I want to learn a new keyboard layout. QWERTY it good enough

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The beauty of QAZWSX, or a modern machine learning backed fuzzy typing layout is that you don’t have to learn it. You roughly press where you would ordinarily and the “AI” does the rest and figures out what you were trying to say.

      • TheCheddarCheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I could kind of see where you were coming from before but… yeah now you’ve lost me.

        I’m not completely against AI, but I wouldn’t want it having control over every aspect of my life just yet. Besides, if you type where you usually would, what’s the point of changing the layout in the first place? Regular keyboards work just fine for me and most people, I don’t see a reason to reinvent the wheel with some forced AI schtick.

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I put AI in quotations because it really isn’t an artificial intelligence, it’s just machine learning.

          Okay, so put it like this, let’s say you split a keyboard in two vertically and then rather than have 13 keys on each side, you have one. But your brain still sees the thirteen keys, when you type, based on a local language model, the keyboard would say, this list of words is most often used after this word. However based on an input on the left side X times and Y times on the right, the word is around a certain length and has a likelihood of these letters being used and then it replaces your gibberish with the word you were trying to type. Obviously with machine learning it gets better over time.

          We walk with these mini computers, why wouldn’t we use them to process communication?

            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You would get a selection of words, like autocorrect now. But if none of those were correct, you could fall back to legacy mode to put in the correct word and next time that word would be weighted so you’re more likely to see it.

              • TheCheddarCheese@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean, I see how this could kind of work… but I still think most people would want to use a regular keyboard. Correct me if I’m wrong, but this seems needlessly complicated, especially since most people use and are fine with the system we have now.

                • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I think that if you had a new keyboard enabled on every new phone, people would adapt. Unfortunately though, that would never happen.

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s an unrealistic expectation to set upon yourself. Machine learning has been prevalent in our lives for a long time already. But as long as you’re happy, that’s all that matters.