Whether you, like me, beleive that QAZWSX keyboards make far more sense, especially in a machine learning world, I think we all agree a layout designed to circumvent jamming typewriter keys doesn’t make sense in modern society on modern devices.

  • oeverbloem@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    everywhere I use 10 fingers to type, I use dvorak; but I still use qwerty on my phone.

    I tried dvorak on my phone keyboard, but my thumbs kept bumping into each other. It was too annoying so I switched back.

    • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Exactly the same here. Since I swipe type, I have to imagine that would be a nightmare on Dvorak with all the vowels clustered together.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    QWERTY Keyboards on a touch screen are still the stupid!

    I know what you are trying to say but the more times I read your post title, the more I feel like I’m having a stroke.

  • ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It makes perfect sense, we’ve been using it forever, it’s the standard, almost every person that’s taken a typing class for the last 150ish years (in the English speaking world), has done so on a qwerty keyboard. Why bother changing something that just works?

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Honestly, it’s a mere shower thought, so I didn’t come prepared with notes and statistics in hand, what I will say is the amount of screen real estate is by far the worst issue.

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        True. But the rule of thumb is that in order to replace an existing working solution, a new model needs to be at least ten times better in quantifiable ways. Otherwise it’s worth staying with the established solution.

        What’s ten times better than qwerty?

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Have you ever tried to type on your phone in landscape while still seeing the content? That’s 8 times better in itself.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            “Have you ever tried to do this thing you’ll never actually need to do?”

            It sounds a hell of a lot more like you’re trying to automate text communication

            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Wait, you’ve never had to type on your phone in landscape? Never played a game and had to type a message in chat? Never had to type while watching a video? Never had to do something in terminal and the text wasn’t legible in portrait? 🥹

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure, and we’ve tried a lot of alternative layouts over the decades.

        None of them stuck around, by and large. Some have ultra-niche followings, sure. But overall, the latin-script world has stuck to (Q|A)WERT(Y|Z). For a reason!

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What I found when I first learned about DVORAK and other layouts and why we use QWERTY, there were some studies that had shown that there wouldn’t really be any significant increase in proficiency using different layouts, and the time needed to readjust to a new layout just isn’t worth it.

    • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use Dvorak, but it has nothing to do with statistics for me. When I switched to Dvorak, it felt more comfortable on my hands. My typing speed is essentially the exact same, for example, and I don’t think you could find a measurable difference depending on which I use. But qualitatively – it feels more comfortable.

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks for this post. I have a friend with baby wrist and maybe Colemak will make her return to work easier.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    a layout designed to circumvent jamming typewriter keys

    BTW, the supposed origin of the QWERTY layout is uncertain, and the story about it being based around avoiding adjacent bigrams has been called into question often enough (PDF, see pg. 169ff). You can see there plenty images of typewriters that had O next to U still (I was left of U), which if you think about bigrams makes no sense as especially back then it was one of by far the most common ones.
    The supposed slowdown is also false as explained in the PDF, as early typewriters were used to receive morse-code, and could type at 60-80 words per minute while the best morse senders capped at ~30, meaning that no slowdown would have been perceivable anyways.

    One proposed origin could be that the early still-not-quite-there developments were based on most people using 4-8 fingers to type not all 10, and alwys the inner fingers and discarding the outer ones.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I seem to see a story I believed for years get debunked almost weekly now, thanks

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks for replying. It sounds like you basically get two (or some number well below one keys per character) keys and the set of possible characters gets somehow distributed between the two “real” keys, then the keyboard uses a predictive algorithm based on previous input to guess which keys were meant to be pressed.

        IMO I’d be willing to try out an implementation of such an idea so long as I could run the predictive algorithm locally on my phone. I do think that current autocorrect + predicting which keys were pressed would require a lot more training data than just a generic autocorrect to get it working sensibly, and I think it would take a lot longer to converge to the user’s “style” if it ever does.

  • DrCake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have enough difficulty when a UI decides to use abc layout, no way would I want to learn a new keyboard layout. QWERTY it good enough

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The beauty of QAZWSX, or a modern machine learning backed fuzzy typing layout is that you don’t have to learn it. You roughly press where you would ordinarily and the “AI” does the rest and figures out what you were trying to say.

      • TheCheddarCheese@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I could kind of see where you were coming from before but… yeah now you’ve lost me.

        I’m not completely against AI, but I wouldn’t want it having control over every aspect of my life just yet. Besides, if you type where you usually would, what’s the point of changing the layout in the first place? Regular keyboards work just fine for me and most people, I don’t see a reason to reinvent the wheel with some forced AI schtick.

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I put AI in quotations because it really isn’t an artificial intelligence, it’s just machine learning.

          Okay, so put it like this, let’s say you split a keyboard in two vertically and then rather than have 13 keys on each side, you have one. But your brain still sees the thirteen keys, when you type, based on a local language model, the keyboard would say, this list of words is most often used after this word. However based on an input on the left side X times and Y times on the right, the word is around a certain length and has a likelihood of these letters being used and then it replaces your gibberish with the word you were trying to type. Obviously with machine learning it gets better over time.

          We walk with these mini computers, why wouldn’t we use them to process communication?

            • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You would get a selection of words, like autocorrect now. But if none of those were correct, you could fall back to legacy mode to put in the correct word and next time that word would be weighted so you’re more likely to see it.

              • TheCheddarCheese@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean, I see how this could kind of work… but I still think most people would want to use a regular keyboard. Correct me if I’m wrong, but this seems needlessly complicated, especially since most people use and are fine with the system we have now.

                • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I think that if you had a new keyboard enabled on every new phone, people would adapt. Unfortunately though, that would never happen.

        • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s an unrealistic expectation to set upon yourself. Machine learning has been prevalent in our lives for a long time already. But as long as you’re happy, that’s all that matters.