Former President Donald Trump hit the jackpot this spring when his social media company finally went public.

Even though Trump Media & Technology Group DJT generates very little revenue, investors are assigning an eye-popping valuation north of $9 billion to the company. Trump’s dominant stake in Trump Media is now valued at nearly $6 billion.

Yet new data shows its main product — the conservative-friendly social network Truth Social — remains a very tiny player in its industry, and it’s getting even smaller.

Truth Social’s average number of daily active US users on iOS and Android dropped by 19% year over year in April to about 113,000, according to data shared exclusively with CNN from Similarweb, a data intelligence company.

  • Null User Object@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    How many of those 113,000 are just reporters waiting for Drumph’s next manufactured controversy to report on? Can they please just stop regurgitating every stupid thing he spouts?

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah also why the hell do they show up at the courthouse every single day after the trial and let him spew his lies? They don’t do that for other people on trial they just report what happened. Why does he get to make it a campaign speech?

  • Wiz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Truth Social’s average number of daily active US users on iOS and Android dropped by 19% year over year in April to about 113,000,

    Lordy that number is embarrassing, when comparing to Mastodon’s MAU count over 847k.

    And people actually paid money for this shit penny-stock.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        While that’s true, the company’s revenue was also shit. So they have no users and are bringing in little money. And also somehow have huge expenditures.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I would imagine that having lawsuits between people at the top of the company trying to get the ability to cash out sooner is not very encouraging either.

          And the SEC finding that their auditing company was involved in large-scale accounting fraud probably doesn’t help.

          EDIT: Apparently this is merely their latest accounting company. Their first one resigned, and they just kicked the second out to start using the third one that just got banned for conducting bogus audits on other companies.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or are they considered political megaphone parrots, hence a valuable userbase?

        AKA: useful idiots.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There might be some limited value to politicians, but not anything like the current valuation.

          I mean, politicians run their own mailing lists, have lists of people to contact already, and there are already political forums out there.

          At least some of it is retail investors who politically believe in Trump, don’t have any idea what they’re doing, and are getting sold a pretty terrible deal. My understanding is that there’s been some discussion over the high proportion of retail investors involved.

          He might walk away with a lot of their money, but I gotta believe that that’s gonna hurt his presidential campaign. If you plow a bunch of your life savings into the guy and he walks off with them, you may not be feeling too friendly towards him afterwards.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            At least some of it is retail investors who politically believe in Trump, don’t have any idea what they’re doing, and are getting sold a pretty terrible deal.

            Those would be the same as the normal audience for “truth” social.

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I’m sure that there’s substantial overlap between the “user” and “investor” groups.

    • LimeZest@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You are comparing a daily active users figure to a monthly active users figure. Truth Social has closer to 2 million active users overall, but only 100,000 on a given day. It’s still really low for a social media company with such a popular public figure at the forefront, but it isn’t lower than Mastodon. The valuation is absolutely absurd regardless as there are so many red flags in their own SEC filings.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let’s say you’re an organization (or foreign actor) who wants to get as many no-strings-attached dollars into Trump’s hands as possible. You can’t do that through campaign donations because those are watched way too closely. You can’t just cut him a check, because that looks suspicious too. What you can do however is buy stock in the company he mostly owns, and inflate the stock price as much as you want.

      • ApostleO@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which explains why it was standard procedure for presidents to put their money in a blind trust. And why Trump didn’t.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          You can stop it by enforcing the Emoulents Clause, and forcing Presidents to disclose all of their finances, and prove they are not taking money from any Foreign government. But Conservatives are very selective about which parts of the Constitution are worth upholding.

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I really really hope a journalist somewhere is investigating the individuals and shell companies that purchase Truth Social stock, because I would bet that this is happening.

          Russia in particular would find it useful because even if it’s done with plausible deniability, it’s another secret that, upon being revealed, would cause major problems for Trump. That is enough to function as leverage.

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I commented on a Reddit post that rddt is worth less than djt currently. I hypothesized that awful moderation was worse than no moderation.

    Mod banned me lol.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well, you were technically wrong, there are more shares of RDDT than DJT, so even though RDDT is cheaper per-share than DJT after yesterday’s close, RDDT’s total market cap is about $1B higher.

      Still no reason for a ban. Now that RDDT is publically traded and has a much higher profile, I wonder if some enterprising lawyer can figure out a class action lawsuit against Reddit for all the people who were banned from the site for bullshit reasons. You’d probably have to prove some actual harm, though. Most Reddit bans only hurt your pride.

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Where were all of those 71 million voters? Was 113k all that they could get of them?