As the title says, I want to know the most paranoid security measures you’ve implemented in your homelab. I can think of SDN solutions with firewalls covering every interface, ACLs, locked-down/hardened OSes etc but not much beyond that. I’m wondering how deep this paranoia can go (and maybe even go down my own route too!).

Thanks!

  • dr_robot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    Logcheck. It took ages to make sure innocent logs are ignored, but now I get an email as soon as anything non-routine happens on my servers. I get emails with logs from every update, every time I log in, etc. This has given me the most confidence that nothing unexpected is happening on my servers. Of course, one needs to make sure that the firewall is configured well, and that you use ssh keys etc., but logcheck is how I know I’m doing enough.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve replaced reconnaissance commands (a handful of them found here: https://www.cybrary.it/blog/linux-commands-used-attackers) – whoami, uname, id, uptime, last, etc

    With shell scripts which run the command but also send me a notification via pushover. I’m running several internet-facing services, and the moment those get run because someone is doing some sleuthing inside the machine, I get notified.

    It doesn’t stop people getting in, I’ve set up other things for that – but on the off chance that there is some zero-day that I don’t know about yet, or they’ve traversed the network laterally somehow, the moment they run one of those commands, I know to kill-switch the entire thing.

    The thing is, security is an on-going process. Leave any computer attached to the internet long enough and it’ll be gotten into. I don’t trust being able to know every method that can be used, so I use this as a backup.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s a very good idea. Something to think about, especially if you have open ports and are paranoid enough (aren’t we all? Hehe). Thanks

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Never used it “in anger” but:

    I have my firewall plugged into a metered outlet (plugged into a UPS). I have it set up to send me alerts if power draw increases beyond a certain threshold. I’ve tested it and wireguard is measurable (yay) but so are DDOS attacks. If I get that alert, I can choose to turn off that plug and take my whole network offline until I get home and can sort that out.

    Gotten a few false positives over the years but mostly that is just texting my partner to ask what they are doing.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or you could trigger automation that turns it off for hours, then turns it back on. That way you could get around the need to physically turn it on, in case everyone is away.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        With my firewall disabled a lot of my internal network (including home assistant) will fall over sooner than later.

        But that is also a recipe for mass stress. Because I know “something happened”. And now I know “in six hours, I need to check in and make sure that ‘something’ is still not happening”. Which is extra shitty if I got the notification late evening local time.

        I have friends/neighbors that I trust to swing by and push a button in the event I need to bring it back up before I get home. But if I have reached the point of “it is possible my wireguard credentials were compromised?” then I really don’t need to be able to download the next episode of ATLA NOW.

  • Kata1yst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Really all I do is setup fail2ban on my very few external services, and then put all other access behind wireguard.

    Logs are clean, I’m happy.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Using SPA firewall knocking (fwknop) to open ports to ssh in. I suppose if I was really paranoid, the most secure would be an air gap, but there’s only so much convenience I’ll give up for security.

    • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m going to save your comment because it has opened up a new technique for network security that I had never thought of before. Thanks a bunch

  • conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I used to have all VMs in my QEMU/KVM server on their own /30 routed network to prevent spoofing. It essentially guaranteed that a compromised VM couldn’t give itself the IP of say, my web server and start collecting login creds. Managing the IP space got painful quick.

  • shadowintheday2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    My most paranoid config is disabling Ipv4

    That’s it. If someone wants to attack me, they will need to adopt IPv6!

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      they will need to adopt IPv6!

      And find your IP in a /56 or /64 range (depending on what your ISP gives you). Good luck.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    My security is fairly simplistic but I’m happy with it

    • software protection

      • fail2ban with low warning hold
      • cert based login for ssh (no password Auth)
      • Honeypot on all common port numbers, which if pinged leads to a permanent IP ban
      • drop all firewall
      • PSAD for intrusion/scanning protection (so many Russian scanners… lol)
      • wireguard for VPN to access local virtual machines and resources
      • external VPN with nordVPN for secure containers (yes I know nord is questionable I plan to swap when my sub runs out)
    • physical protection

      • luksCrypt on the sensitive Data/program Drive ( I know there’s some security concerns with luksCrypt bite me)
      • grub and bios locked with password
      • UPS set to auto notify on power outage
      • router with keep alive warning system that pings my phone if the lab goes offline and provides fallback dns
    • things I’ve thought about:

      • a mock recovery partition entry that will nuke the Luks headers on entry (to prevent potential exploit getting through grub)
      • removing super user access completely outside of local user access
  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago
    • Custom Router/Firewall running OPNsense and the Sensei plugin
    • Extensive DNS filtering through Pihole
    • Redirecting all DNS requests to my Pihole through OPNsense
    • My entire network is behind a multi hop VPN
    • I don’t let any Windows systems connect to the internet, instead, I have a Linux server which is connected to the internet (through a VPN of course) and runs a browser, and I use X2go to access the browser which is running on the Linux server
  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    AP WiFi Access Point
    CA (SSL) Certificate Authority
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    HTTPS HTTP over SSL
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    PiHole Network-wide ad-blocker (DNS sinkhole)
    SBC Single-Board Computer
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
    SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
    TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    15 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 16 acronyms.

    [Thread #493 for this sub, first seen 6th Feb 2024, 16:55] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Only remote access by wireguard and ssh on non standard port with key based access.

    Fail2ban bans after 1 attempt for a year. Tweaked the logs to ban on more strict patterns

    Logs are encrypted and mailed off site daily

    System updates over tor connecting to onion repos.

    Nginx only has one exposed port 443 that is accessible by wireguard or lan. Certs are signed by letsencrypt. Paths are ip white listed to various lan or wireguard ips.

    Only allow one program with sudo access requiring a password. Every other privelaged action requires switching to root user.

    I dont allow devices I dont admin on the network so they go on their own subnet. This is guests phones and their windows laptops.

    Linux only on the main network.

    I also make sure to backup often.

  • nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    For about a year I was running a full out of band IPS on my network. My core switch was set up with port mirroring to spit out a copy of all traffic on one port so that my Suricata server could analyze it. Then, this was fed into ElasticSearch and a bunch of big data crap looked for anomalies.

    It was cool. Basically useless because all it did was complain about the same IP crawler bots as my nginx logs. But fun to setup and ultimately good for my career lol.