I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But real Advil has the candy coating on the outside, and I haven’t found a generic that does =(

    Otherwise 100% identical yes.

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Problem with the candy coating is you can’t enjoy it, unless you want to suddenly learn what pure poison tastes like. It’s such a tease. Doesn’t help that they look like scrumptious little caramel-y morsels.

    • Johandea@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, what? I have no idea what advil is, but sugar coating any drug is a recipe for disaster.

      • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sugarcoating pills is fairly common, especially for pills which are frequently ingested or target older demographics. It’s because sugar coatings are much gentler on the esophagus (i.e.: less likely to cause esophagitis, “pill burn”). Advil (i.e.: ibuprofen) is a cheap, well tolerated, and non habit-forming pain reliever – it’s about as safe as such a thing could possibly be, so hopefully that helps to explain why a sugar coating might be warranted given the aforementioned upsides (for the love of all that is holy; always read the directions on the label, it’s still quite possible that Advil is not safe for you specifically). FWIW: the bottles also have childproofing mechanisms built into the caps (… at least in U.S. markets. Not sure about elsewhere?)

          • Norgur@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you have a wrong image of how this looks/works. It’s not like there is a cany-shell or something. It’s a regular, smooth pill. You usually do not notice this coating because you don’t keep a pill in your mouth. If you were to, the pill would taste sweet.

            If you ever have gotten a pill of some sort that dd not feel chalky on the outside but smooth and looked kinda shiny, that probably has been a sugarcoated pill.

    • Raptor_007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few years ago, I wondered why that was and googled it. I came to an Advil site with an expandable FAQ, and one of the questions was “why does Advil taste sweet?”

      So I expanded it out to reveal this shocking answer (or something similar): “Advil tastes sweet because it is lightly coated in sugar.”

      Thanks, I guess. I just closed the tab in mild irritation and moved on with my day.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep

      There may be a difference in things like pill shape, texture, release mechanism / time to absorb (if it’s not very important for how the medication works)

      So it’s ok to have a preference for one brand over the other when one of those points is relevant to your situation. I know some people also prefer the generic brand version over the regular (even if prices were the same)