![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
Make it unobtrusive. Otherwise reconsider
Make it unobtrusive. Otherwise reconsider
deleted by creator
Check out this comprehensive review from 2022 about vaping and health:
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-065997
The last bit in its conclusion section states:
“The true impact of vaping on respiratory health will manifest over the coming decades, but in the interval a prudent and time tested recommendation remains to abstain from consumption of inhaled nicotine and other products.”
Ah yes, those loaded guns that are lying about everywhere because guns are just products to be sold to everyone.
Said no sane country ever
Because the way the yanks have no control over corporate interests in their country is natural selection?
Not necessarily. For instance, YouTube uses the old ad model and is of course not creator owned.
Additionally, you can use patreon while also using (and capitalising on) your own content distribution systems.
This is all to say, I do think the ad model may stay somewhat relevant, however, I also think that other income avenues are helpful and enable content creators more flexibility in terms of the manner in which they think they can best reach their audiences while generating income
I think it is worth mentioning that patreon also surfaced as a means to provide income for creators. Whether this was a direct result of ad blockers may be debatable. However, patreon certainly provides creators with an avenue to generate income that is not dependent on ads services.
Then there are also creator focused platforms like nebula and curiosity stream, which aim to provide creators with a fair share of generated revenue.
All in all, my take on the developments over the past ten years or so is that ad revenue sharing (with creators) provided an important impulse to establish the field of online content creation, and that shortcomings of this model are now being addressed. Mainly to funnel more money to the content creators rather than platform owners.
Brush your teeth and floss
Except if you want to do good science. Good scientists will identify false confidence and will aim to steer well clear of it
I don’t get the diverging diamond interchanges one
The only thing that works consistently for me is to wash my hair and scalp with baking soda. May sound wierd and I don’t know why it works for me but it does so I’m continuing to use it
GTK is mainly developed by Gnome
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK
There’s nothing socially unacceptable about this. This is environmentally unacceptable
Who are you adressing? The guardian article refers to retractions in multiple journals.
Also, people are worried about socioeconomic factors involved in plasma donation and euthanasia. As they should be. These are always important to be aware of and to actively try to preempt.
These things don’t absolve the retracted papers from criticism. Nor do they exclude any other research from close scrutiny
Episode 1 racer. I finished the game multiple times before realising that there was a turbo you could activate
It really is