That’s a good point, thanks.
Astonishing how complicated and fragile the political state of the world is right now.
That’s a good point, thanks.
Astonishing how complicated and fragile the political state of the world is right now.
Gaza is definitely no threat, that’s why I thought that the whole world (politically, not necessarily the people) already accepted that Israel will not stop there until it has taken Gaza, West Bank and maybe even Golan (without the people that lived there of course…). With continued weapon shipments and other material needed for that from its allies of course.
However, the US engaging in a war against Iran would be, well, I don’t know how to put it… some serious shit…
Agreed, however, this only works if Iran retaliates with restraint. If a full-scale war in the already destabilized region emerges with Iran bombing the shit out if them, all just because of that embassy attack… idk… this is some really risky strategy, but I’m far from an expert here.
What I still do not get is why they attacked the embassy of a country that always was clearly hostile towards them and has quite some military power. I mean right now with the war in Gaza, don’t they have enough on their plate?
Edit (finally could @-mention): As @[email protected] mentioned, it must have been clear from the beginning that this is a serious violation of international law.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That pattern sounds familiar, indeed. Thanks.