minus-squareZion@lemmy.worldOPtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Question regarding license choice for my programlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months agoThanks for the replies everyone. I’ve decided to not let my concerns overcome the most important thing of releasing the project as fully open source. Just going to go with GPLv3 and not worry about the clones that will happen regardless of the license type, if the program becomes popular. Thank you all for your insight and for helping me come to what I believe to be the best decision. linkfedilink
Zion@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-210 months agoQuestion regarding license choice for my programplus-squarelemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down11
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkQuestion regarding license choice for my programplus-squarelemmy.worldZion@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-210 months agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareZion@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Flatpak standing the test of time: modern Flatpak apps running on Ubuntu 16.04 ESM, a 7-year-old distrolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoHave you tried flatseal? linkfedilink
minus-squareZion@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.ml•Glibc Dynamic Loader Hit By A Nasty Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoI thought you were joking until I clicked the link. linkfedilink
Thanks for the replies everyone. I’ve decided to not let my concerns overcome the most important thing of releasing the project as fully open source.
Just going to go with GPLv3 and not worry about the clones that will happen regardless of the license type, if the program becomes popular.
Thank you all for your insight and for helping me come to what I believe to be the best decision.