TrippyHippyDan

It’s all a sunk-cost fallacy. They’ve dumped all of this money into it, so therefore they have to double down on it.

Especially if they’re trying to get a bunch of money from Wall Street and other investors.

The biggest contributor being all of these companies believe they can now just lay off a bunch of workers and make up the difference with these LLMs even though they are not at all a replacement for humans.

Less workers, less people that have to pay, and more money can be funneled to the top.

Then how do you feel on the minimum age?

But there’s a certain point where your age does matter when you’re trying to do what is said to be the most stressful job on the planet.

The stress from the job is just going to make them have those cognitive decline faster at the age that they’re at.

So age does matter. Where it should not be the only marker, it should be included in the decision.

Also, there’s already a limit on how old you have to be to run for president. There should be a top end as well for the same reasons you are no longer reflecting the majority of your peers at that point.

And when you consider most 80 year olds don’t understand technology at all, and I haven’t met any 80 year olds that were up to date, it is a big factor.

Don’t you just love how it’s all about states’ rights when it comes to things like abortion, but as soon as it’s gun control, the states’ rights don’t matter.

Extremely, hopefully it pulls through on the side of the Archive