• 2 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle

  • Your missing the part in the middle where you spend 6 months telling them in no uncertain terms that the thing they are asking is stupid and will not work properly/safely.

    Various back and forth emails, a completely “justified” performance review program because of your “falling standards” and several meetings with various managers at different levels of “importance”.

    Also the “You’re absolutely correct, ENJOY” is written at the bottom of your resignation letter or told to them directly in your “redundancy” exit interview.


  • I read your reply as stating that the only outcomes could be “argue and make things worse” or “don’t do that”, a negative and a neutral respectively.

    I perhaps read only the words and not the intent, I think we are may be saying the same thing.

    In case we are not :

    Not engaging actively frees someone up to do literally anything else, which could overall be more positive than just the prevention of the negative.

    In addition some people might consider the avoidance of the argument itself to be a positive rather than just maintaining a neutral position.







  • Yeah, I’m going with a tiny dedicated infra bootstrapping box with all the tools I’d need to bootstrap the main infrastructure.

    Using a hypervisor (proxmox in this case) I have some prebuilt vms’s and container images that I can use for the bootstrap instances so i’d not need to completely hand roll it again should it be needed.

    I’m looking at cloudinit scripts to see if that’s useful for this.

    I really like packer but I’m hesitant to rely on anything hashicorp until whatever they have going on shakes out.

    Then I just load up the bootstrap box with the main infra code and use woodpecker to deploy.

    Code and config backed up, also mirrored to newly created infra forgejo instances, just in case.

    If I can get a semi presentable cloud init based bootstrap system working nicely I’ll stick it somewhere people can get to it, in case it’s useful to someone else.






  • Senal@programming.devtoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate that guy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are you genuinely struggling to understand why people who think he’s actively saying hateful shit about trans people wouldn’t necessarily want to increase his presence in the general Zeitgeist?

    Or did you just want to slip in the “stereotypical white guy” dog whistle?

    If you are actually struggling, i can probably help.

    imagine a person saying horrible shit about you, specifically.

    Now imagine they have a platform where they say this hateful shit to lots of people, enough that you sometimes run across these people and they also say hateful shit to you, perhaps worse.

    Now imagine an unrelated meme is made with this persons face on it and you see it 5,10,15 times a week.

    Now imagine that the comments on most of these memes feature a whole bunch of people defending this person and agreeing with the hateful shit they said about you.

    I’d imagine that’s why some people care.

    Genuine question though, what would be the right thing to give the energy/importance to in this scenario?



  • OK, so let’s assume that’s a good faith literal interpretation.

    Let’s try it this way.

    Yes, it possibly would be considered more logical, but people who threaten kids over videogames aren’t generally considered to be working with an abundance of logical thought.

    I could however be wrong in this generalisation given I only have my experience to go on, if your experience leads you to believe people who threaten kids over videogames are not running with a logic deficit then your statement makes sense I suppose.




  • I don’t think there’s any data Microsoft can get through you using edge that they can’t also get just by controlling your OS

    I’d put mid-level money on that not being true. There are a lot of things going on in a browser, a lot of which aren’t particularly easy to access from the outside.

    Not to say it isn’t possible.

    There are valid reasons to use windows and if you’ve gotta use it anyway they’ve already got your data from the start

    To a degree yes, but assuming they aren’t pulling nefarious shit in the background, there are in theory many things you can turn off or somewhat neutralise using the options in the OS to reduce the level of data collection.

    They are slowly removing those options but they still exist for now.

    Again, i fully understand people not wanting to go to the trouble to achieve a goal they don’t care about, but that isn’t the same as there being nothing you can do if you wish to.


  • There shouldn’t be any of the Googled parts of Chrome in Edge, just as there aren’t any Googled parts of Chrome in stock Chromium.

    There are at the very least googled parts of chromium in it though : https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium

    Unless google have significantly changed the way they package and build chromium recently there are still google web service dependencies and i believe binary blobs (though they may have changed the closed source blob policy iirc)

    Of course, you are now giving your data to Microsoft instead of Google, which isn’t really a win or a lose. If you’re not paying for the software, you’re either using FOSS, or the software is paid for by selling access to you and your computer.

    Indeed


  • If you’re using windows you’re already giving Microsoft data so may as well

    While technically correct, to me this sounds like “You haven’t managed to stop some of the tracking, why not just give them everything?” which is personally not my approach.

    Not to say that my approach isn’t effort and is even effective, but I’d much rather limit the damage in the ways i can rather than give up entirely. I can see why someone wouldn’t want to put in that kind of effort though and i don’t fault them for it.

    Edge uses chromium not chrome, I would hazard a guess there’s much less data harvesting going on in base chromium given it’s open source and people can see exactly what they collect

    Open source yes, but not necessarily free from data-harvesting.

    The fact that un-googled chromium (and others like it) exist implies that straight up chromium being open source isn’t a guarantee they aren’t doing consumer-hostile shit anyway.

    Though, yes, it’s almost certainly less than full-fat chrome.