Tell me you have never been to Randall’s Island without saying you’ve never been to Randall’s island…
If anything the NIMBY crowd in NYC wants to keep this population here.
Tell me you have never been to Randall’s Island without saying you’ve never been to Randall’s island…
If anything the NIMBY crowd in NYC wants to keep this population here.
Ah… gracias!
I’ve read this book…
So you are admitting there is a conflict between two laws that needs to be reconciled.
I propose creating a system… we could call it the “law conflict figuring out process or “LCFOP” for short. It would be a perfect place for people to voice thoughts that come after phrases like “To me a law means…”
It’s a crazy idea I know.
Edit: Also, this last comment you made at least digs into the substance of the issue in a way your initial reactionary comment does not. Thank you for adding to the conversation about the rights use of religion as a Trojan Horse for conservative legal positions.
Can’t argue with that understanding of the US legal system.
How is this church acting like it is above the law in this specific instance?
It used the legal system to get a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of town land use code. Seems like it followed the law and the process is playing out as intended.
Is he repped yet? If not and anyone knows how to get in touch with his people please contact me. I have a line on a few free attorneys that take cases of this magnitude.