

I have a neutral stance on circumcision. Do what you please. I just wish people like you could try to prove a point without using “mutilation” over and over to make it sound worse than it actually is. It puts an agenda on your point and biases it. There’s nothing mutilated about it. It’s just altered.
If you consider this to be mutilation then that would also mean you think any gender affirming surgery is also mutilation. And one could much easier argue that converting a penis to a vagina is far more mutilating than just removing some extra skin from a penis.
So if you’re trying to convince people to stop circumcision, stop using overly dramatic words and just explain why it’s not necessary. Otherwise I’ll just roll my eyes at people like you.
False. They take out special loans only available to billionaires at less than 1% interest. They use their stock as collateral. They never pay back these loans because they don’t want to sell their stock and pay taxes in order to repay them. The banks don’t mind because they know they’re good for it. They keep doing this over and over. Their long term plan is when they die their estate will pay off their debt. That’s the recipe they use to pay zero taxes.