Could have been easy enough to say that It doesn’t matter if Elon did it. No one should ever get in trouble for a drug that should be rescheduled to be like cigarettes or pot.
Then your argument could have been on any of the other factors. The only idea put forth was that since a rich people can get away with avoiding a law there shouldn’t be a law. That is a consistent libertarian view. It hooks people because it sounds fair while increasing inequality and gives the rich and ability to push the window farther and father right. That libertarian argument is popular with fascists and I call that out.
Look, I’m open to a more nuanced conversation. I believe in regulation, not bans, not oppression.
Could have been easy enough to say that It doesn’t matter if Elon did it. No one should ever get in trouble for a drug that should be rescheduled to be like cigarettes or pot.
Then your argument could have been on any of the other factors. The only idea put forth was that since a rich people can get away with avoiding a law there shouldn’t be a law. That is a consistent libertarian view. It hooks people because it sounds fair while increasing inequality and gives the rich and ability to push the window farther and father right. That libertarian argument is popular with fascists and I call that out.