• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The business model isn’t terrible, it makes money, but it is terrible for the consumer

    • Envy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the business model were successful, then the GaaS model wouldnt be full of bloated corpses of failed projects

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you think that GaaS means that you have more failed projects, then look at how many normal games failed before launch.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          GaaS means you have ongoing expenses after launch in a way that normal games do not. The costs are higher, but they keep chasing the much larger reward that only a super small percentage will ever achieve.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The business model isn’t terrible, it makes money, but it is terrible for the consumer

      I am aggressively opposed to anything that is profitable at the expense of the consumer. That is a terrible business model.