Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So it doesn’t end?

      Edit: barring NATO rolling in and starting WW3 that’s clearly not gonna happen. So what’s next?

      • MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why are you arguing for Ukraine to forgive and forget the rapes and murders and to give up parts off their country to the perpetrators rather than arguing for Russia to go back to Russia?

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Clearly Russia isn’t going to do that, no matter how much a bunch of nobodies argue for it online.

          Which actually realistic path leads to less dead people?

          • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Negotiations don’t exist for Russia, they are known for breaking all agreements anyways. Russia is not trustworthy in the slightest, they have never missed to prove that. You don’t push the trigger on a loaded gun and hope for it to not fire. If you believe otherwise you desperately need to get out of you bubble and drink less Vodka.

            Russian people killing Putin is the only way to end this sooner.

            • SevFTW@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Putin-fanboys love to say “Ukraine needs to negotiate an end to this war” but like to forget that this war started because RuZZia shat on a treaty ensuring the sovereignty of Ukraine in exchange for their nuclear arms.

          • fhqwhgads@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Clearly this bully isn’t going to stop trying to take your lunch money. If you continue trying to defend yourself it’s just going to lead to more fights and you getting hurt more. If you just give up your lunch money peacefully then it’ll be better for everybody!

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t just boil geopolitics down like that.

              The longer this goes the more people die. We can’t seem to stop Russia without plunging the world into more war…

              • fhqwhgads@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The longer you keep fighting back, the more you will keep being hit. We can’t seem to stop the bully without you getting hurt more, so just be a good little boy and hand over your lunch money peacefully. And when the bully demands the contents of your backpack, hand that over to avoid more bloodshed. And when he demands your hat, hand that over too. You don’t want to keep getting hurt, do you?

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then russia suffers until they learn (so probably forever).

        Ukraine has the will and the west has the means to make this a very painful lesson, maybe even Russians can learn this time.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          By every account Russia has the manpower to outlast Ukraine in this. I’m sure whoever is left in Ukraine once NATO is done teaching Russia this “lesson” will be so glad to have been a part of this.

          • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you lay off the Kremlin propaganda for a minute you’ll realize what a laughing stock they are to the real militaries in the world.

            • 🏳️‍⚧️Edward [it/its]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ok so, assuming the Russian army is the laughing stock of the world, then why isn’t the Ukrainian Army an even bigger laughing stock?

              For a long time I heard one thing after another about how incompetent the Russian army is. For 1 and a half years, the most incompetent, laughing stock of the world, army has been… losing?

              • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because ukraine is a smaller country, and has been handing russia its ass.

                This is exactly like if the US attacked canada and got its ass handed to it.

                No, Canada is actually competent, this is much worse.

                • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The counteroffensive has been an utter disaster, they’ve reclaimed almost no land in months and it has severely cost them in lost men and equipment. Ukraine is anything but competent as they are hugely struggling in the heavily mined territories also covered by artillery and air support.

          • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            By every account Russia has the manpower to outlast Ukraine in this.

            Wars don’t end because you kill everyone on the other side. The American revolutionaries didn’t murder every single English citizen on the face of the earth. Yet, they still won.

            The point is to last long enough and inflict enough losses that the other side does not want to continue the war. In Clausewitzian terms, even if you can’t win the Trial of Strength, you can still win the Battle of Wills.

            I’m sure whoever is left in Ukraine once NATO is done teaching Russia this “lesson” will be so glad to have been a part of this.

            Ukraine is an independent country that is completely capable of deciding for themselves whether, and at what cost, they want to keep fighting off a foreign invader occupying their territory. This is also part of the “Battle of Wills”.

            I’m not saying that NATO and its members don’t have an interest in the conflict, but the tell-tale sign that you’re regurgitating Russian propaganda is that in your arguments Ukraine has no agency.

          • fhqwhgads@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You really been huffing that Russian propaganda, huh? It’ll turn your brain to mush, you should really stop.

      • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what’s next?

        who knows, but maybe some progress will be made when more modern weapons can be fired from western F16’s. It likely won’t have a huge impact, but every little bit helps

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If someone invades your country and kills your countrymen you don’t negotiate with them. You tell them to get the fuck out or we’ll kill every one of you motherfuckers that decides to continue being on our land. Why? You going to advocate being like Chamberlain? Or Quisling? What do you suggest someone does if their country is invaded?

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you show you’ve never heard of the war of the triple alliance or of Paraguay, without saying war of the triple alliance or Paraguay.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think Russia will unconditionally surrender and stop fighting when Ukraine reaches the Russian border?

            • Hyperreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t think Ukraine is about to conquer Russia or capture Moscow, even if they wanted to or if we want them to.

              Do you think Russia will unconditionally surrender and stop fighting when Ukraine reaches the Russian border?

              • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A safety buffer zone of a few kilometers, on the Russian side, past the Ukrainian country, sounds reasonable. Depending on how far they still keep shooting.

              • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have no idea. Even if they don’t, Ukraine just has to defend their territory, which they have proven more than capable of.

                The only one party that can end this conflict is the aggressor.

                • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The only thing they’ve proven is that the West really wanted to get rid of their old weapon stock.

        • Hyperreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          The UK negotiated with the IRA.

          The US negotiated with the Japanese.

          The allies negotiated with the Nazis.

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m fine with the Japanese solution, which Russian cities should we delete?

            The German solution seems awfully similar.

            • Hyperreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m fine with winning the lottery. That isn’t likely either.

              Ukraine doesn’t have nukes, so the Japanese solution is off the table.

              Ukraine isn’t about to conquer Moscow, so the German solution isn’t feasible either.

              • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                North Korea has nukes, you’re honestly telling me ukraine, the ones who figured it out in the soviet union, can’t figure it out too?

                Ukraine is the smart remnant of the soviet union, Russia needs to surrender out of sheer terror.

              • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, but the US does. I, for one, as an SSBN sailor, am ready and willing to set condition 1SQ for Strategic nuclear launch at any time. Slava Ukraini, HOOYAH AMERICA. Kill the Bear!

            • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I really don’t like how often I see people ok with the idea of nuclear war. I like Fallout as much as the next person but I don’t think it’s an accurate representation of nuclear apocalypse.

            • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I hope the ghosts of hundreds of thousands of murdered Japanese civilians haunt you for the rest of your life. thank fuck even the post-1945 US government isn’t as bloodthirsty for war crimes as you are

              • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                They didn’t surrender, they wouldn’t surrender, the alternative of murdering them slowly by starvation wasn’t magically better.

                Sometimes you just have to explain how hopeless things are.

                • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  what if we had records of contemporary US top military leaders saying the exact opposite, would you stop cheerleading for mass slaughter then?

                  because, in an amazing coincidence…

                  While a majority of Americans may not be familiar with this history, the National Museum of the U.S. Navy in Washington, D.C., states unambiguously on a plaque with its atomic bomb exhibit: “The vast destruction wreaked by the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the loss of 135,000 people made little impact on the Japanese military. However, the Soviet invasion of Manchuria … changed their minds.”…

                  Seven of the United States’ eight five-star Army and Navy officers in 1945 agreed with the Navy’s vitriolic assessment. Generals Dwight Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur and Henry “Hap” Arnold and Admirals William Leahy, Chester Nimitz, Ernest King, and William Halsey are on record stating that the atomic bombs were either militarily unnecessary, morally reprehensible, or both.

                  No one was more impassioned in his condemnation than Leahy, Truman’s chief of staff. He wrote in his memoir “that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender …. In being the first to use it we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages.”

                  MacArthur thought the use of atomic bombs was inexcusable. He later wrote to former President Hoover that if Truman had followed Hoover’s “wise and statesmanlike” advice to modify its surrender terms and tell the Japanese they could keep their emperor, “the Japanese would have accepted it and gladly I have no doubt.”

                  Before the bombings, Eisenhower had urged at Potsdam, “the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing.”

                  https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-08-05/hiroshima-anniversary-japan-atomic-bombs

          • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure the negotiations consisted on total surrender and heavy controls of power in the three cases, which Zelenskyy agrees on. Just giving more territories to Russia is not what they want. That would only mean a new offensive in a few years.

            • Hyperreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In other words, even Zelensky knows there’ll have to be negotiations somewhere down the line.

              It’s just a question of when and under which circumstances.

              It’s in Ukraine and Europe’s interests, that these negotiations occur when Russia has been pushed back to the border. Otherwise they’ll have been rewarded for their military adventurism.

              And obviously Russia can’t be trusted, so the moment a cease fire is signed, it’s imperative that Ukraine gets defacto NATO membership (or something approaching it) and is armed to the teeth.

      • lonke@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Either you give them land from which they can prepare their next attack or you show them that they’re unable to take and hold land. So yeah. Pretty much.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally yes. If they capitulate it’s only a matter of time before Putin tries again, either by fomenting a revolution and installing another pro-Russia dictator, or restarting the war. This is a fight for the very survival of Ukraine.

          • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Putin is trying to kill both. Those human beings deserve to live and they deserve a country too – the country they are dying to defend.

            • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think them conscripts would rather do something other dying for their country. I know I would.

              Have you ever read Catch-22? Yossarian likes to go on about how everybody is trying to kill him. If you’re a Ukrainian soldier it’s not just Putin who’s out to kill you. It’s your own government too, and apparently the average western lib on this very internet forum.

              • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you believe this why are you not advocating for the Russian conscripts who are forced to fight a madman’s war of aggression and territorial expansion? Like sympathizing for the Ukrainian troops forced to fight is fine but I think you fail to realize the alternative for them is to die at the hands of the Russian military.

                Only one side here is engaged in a purely optional war of territorial expansion. And it isn’t “the west” or Ukraine.

                • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh I do consider the Russian soldiers victims that should be helped to escape their situation.

                  madman

                  No need to figure out how or why this war broke out, Putin is simply mad. It follows from that also that you can’t reason with the guy. Do you think this is a children’s cartoon?

                  alternative for them is to die at the hands of the Russian military

                  You gotta explain this. Last time I checked, the civilians casualties in this war weren’t that high, and civilians can and do usually stay clear of the front lines. They might even leave the country if the men were allowed to. So if they weren’t soldiers, they almost certainly wouldn’t die at the hands of the Russian military.

                  • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The war broke out because Putin covets Ukraine and always has. He is a kleptocrat and dictator with no interest in his own people’s happiness or their rights; he seeks personal enrichment and power and that is his goal here as well. I think “madman” is a perfectly acceptable way to describe him, and we haven’t even begun to discuss his army’s conduct in the war.

                    Russia is targeting Ukrainian civilians specifically. It is even targeting children.

                    Given this, why do you believe if the Ukrainians lay down their arms Russia wouldn’t continue doing exactly what it has been doing — trying to kill their civilian population and deport their children?

                    There’s absolutely no evidence Russia would let anyone leave and quite a lot of evidence they would continue committing war crimes against them.

                    Edit: and this article literally just got published today: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/10/world/europe/russian-ukraine-torture.html

              • mashbooq@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ukrainians would disagree; they’re the ones to want to fight and if their government tried to give up, they’d throw them out and find someone willing to keep going

                • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If they all want to fight so bad, why are the men not allowed to leave the country? Why has Zelensky recently announced a crackdown on draft dodging? Why are there so many videos of men getting dragged kicking and screaming into vans by military recruiters kidnappers?