• WagesOf@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sure would be nice if the bar was the rational one of “better” but people aren’t rational. It’s literally never going to be good enough, because even if it were perfect it still can’t be used.

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think one of the big issues psychologically about self-driving cars that people find really hard to come to terms with is the fact that even with the best systems, accidents are bound to happen and without a driver there’s no one to blame and we hate that.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is - the company. Which they obviously don’t like. I think a huge chunk of people would be fine with them if the companies took responsibility.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember something about Mercedes taking liability when self driving is active, although I don’t know if that still holds. Still, this seems like something that can be approached with proper legislation, assuming we can get past the lobbying BS in the US (though the EU will probably make the right call much sooner).

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, I’m pretty confident they won’t be autonomously driving on EU roads legally until they conform to pretty strict legislation which I’m pretty sure will include the liability of the company.

            Nice of Mercedes to do the right thing without being forced to, that’s surprisingly rare.