• very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So many words to tell us you’ve read zero theory…

    Also, how on earth is “Fuck cars” a successful “socialist experiment”? The biggest action anyone associated with that movement is flatten a few tires from SUV’s

    • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      socialism is when I listen to NPR. capitalism is when I go to my parent’s house for Christmas. communism is when I get to program the radio presets in mom’s Honda Odyssey. social democracy is when I go to Starbucks. liberalism is when I look through the LL Bean catalogue.

          • Nationalgoatism [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s definitely a usage of the word socialism I have heard, but it is not generally a definition most socialists or socialist parties would use and it has some issues in my opinion.

            This is such a broad definition of socialism as to make it almost meaningless, as this definition fits every nation on earth today and most through history. ancient Rome used public money to fund public roads, subsidized grain for the poor, public entertainment and land grants for veterans, public aqueducts, and other public programs, yet this was 2000 years before the concept of socialism was really invented and I don’t think anyone is holding up ancient Rome as an example of a socialist society.

            I would define socialism by two characteristics. One is control over the political economy by the proletariat (workers), as opposed to the bourgeoisie (capitalists/financiers/business owners). In a bourgeois run capitalist state, there is still publicly funded services, but they generally set up to benefit privately run industry (public highways, government subsidized research, police) or they are concessions won by the proletariat through class struggle (universal healthcare, social welfare programs).

            The second characteristic is economic organization around common need, rather than around the pursuit of profits. This would require taking the means off production (factories, businesses, utilities, etc) out of the hands of the bourgeoisie.

          • glingorfel [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            socialism can be understood as the transitional state between a capitalist mode of production and a communist one. the US government is a 100% certified capitalist state, any project they have undertaken has nothing to do with socialism

          • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would you use a monarch’s definition of democracy to define democracy?

            Do you think that definition would be fair or even accurate?

            Because you are using a capitalist definition of socialism, which is just as unfair and inaccurate.

      • temptest [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Interstate Highways and similar systems are “successful” socialism, as far as I understand socialism

        I must be blunt here: socialism is not about taxation. At all. Socialist communes don’t even require taxes or money to exist. Socialism is about workers’ relationship with work.

      • UnicodeHamSic [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “far as I understand socialism” We got a lot to unpack here.

        Youbtalked about how all the post soviet states crumbled into disrepair. They are cpaitlaist. That is cpaitlaism. When they were not capitalist things got better. When they were cpaitlaist. Things got worse. This is basic stuff here.

          • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are lies, and then there are statistics, and trying to do living standard calculations about this shit with a 10% cutoff that’s including the feudal warlords who owned literally everything and were spending fuckoff amounts of money on fucking glass eggs is just dancing around the actual point here.

            They went from a feudal partially industrialized backwater to space in the span of ~30 years, with a catastrophic war right in the middle. They operated for decades under siege from the rest of the world outside their relatively small and poor sphere.

            I don’t like capitalism or hate socialism. I hate that the universe works in such a way that my lifestyle - no car, living with my parents, and writing on a modern computer with fiber internet access for a living, with no possessions individually worth more than $5000 and a net worth of basically zero - is not fair under capitalism AND impossible under the kind of world YOU want to live in.

            You want to live in a world where my only niche in life is too luxurious for everyone else? Fuck you, I’ll just commit suicide.

            Socialism is when no electronic treats? those devices you’re so protective of are almost definitely made in China or nearby already, what do you think the anti-China warmongering is going to result in if not a disruption of your treats?

            your life sounds pretty miserable under capitalism, wild how we have a system which prioritizes the right of property owners to extract rents from people in perpetuity.

              • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m trying to say, this isn’t about a fucking political compass to me, and I don’t have a position on that compass.

                The compass shit is bullshit anyways

                revolutions ALWAYS fail.

                They have succeeded in the past, and it was often disabled people fighting the hardest for socialist revolution- because the status quo was killing them. Helen keller was a socialist.

                My life is miserable because I have a disability that means I have to rely on others and was literally been screwed out of a happy childhood by my own government from 2001-2002. I can barely trust my government to give me enough to live on (~$20,000 CAD a year), and full-bodied lasseiz-faire capitalism would view me as human vermin, while all attempts at communism has proven to be endemically-afflicted with an authoritarian existence that would have me exterminated as “useless”.

                You are in full-bodied capitalism, it’s just that it’s the people outside your national borders who are the ‘human vermin’ getting exterminated by your countries military, along with its allies. You get some meager existence in the meantime and lots of treats to enjoy.

                You seem pretty worked up about this, but don’t seem to have an understanding of what socialists even want. You also don’t seem interested in learning.

                I work with people who are unhoused living on the streets with far less toys than you have, I’ve know many people that didn’t make it through the last few years. You can eat my shit and hair.

                  • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Last I checked canada was part of the international-community-1international-community-2 that has been marauding around the world for the last century murdering brown people

                    Fuck you piss baby you’re literally the one trying to guilt everyone else into not having a revolution because you don’t want to lose video games

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even by you’d definition of “socialism” being public infrastructure spending, how is the US highway system more successful than the Chinese High Speed Rail system?