• jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would they prove to you that the funding for schools is necessary? What studies do you require? How is the state going to conduct these studies (in your view), in a timely manner that will positively impact this generation?

    There is plenty of research showing, e.g., that fewer kids per teacher provides for better education. Studies that show the benefit of school nurses, counselors, and other wellness experts. All of this costs $$$, often way more money than any given community is willing or even able to put up. This is why strong state funding is so important, rather than relying on levies and bonds. Requiring your specific state to prove the value of teachers, special education, etc is quite an ask. Why isn’t the existing research good enough for you?

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Studies have shown that spending more per student doesn’t increase the quality of the education. That has been proven time and time again.

      Yet some people think funding is the issue.

      The I attended two high schools, one spent about twice as much as the other but the other school out performed the other. It’s not always about the money.