• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not just about runtime performance, but also about coding flexibility, and for example also reduction of boilerplate.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah yes, I love how C++ is has so little boilerplate. Sometimes I can even write several statements in a row without any!

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You’ve missed the context. There are occasions in Rust where you have to use more boilerplate code which you wouldn’t have to implement in C++ to that extent.

        But saying that C++ is free of boilerplate is of course ridiculous, if you are not able to heavily leverage templates, CRTPs, macros and alike.