Clarence Thomas wrote a scathing, nearly 50-page dissent about why the Supreme Court should have gutted voting rights
www.businessinsider.com
Thomas was one of four conservative justices who dissented in Thursday's 5-4 ruling that backed the Voting Rights Act.
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgMEnglish
    26·
    2 years ago

    there are three constants in life: death, taxes, and Clarence Thomas writing legal opinions which should get him disbarred from the judiciary and legal system entirely

    • zkikiz@lemmy.mlEnglish
      19·
      2 years ago

      And which, if applied retroactively, would have prevented him from being a judge in the first place, thus creating a time paradox

      • catharticrespite@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        13·
        2 years ago

        I like the idea of Clarence Thomas with a time machine getting coked up and creating one of those wall charts with string trying to discern which rights he can subvert without harming himself in the present