Have you actually read the reasoning behind the anti-rust? it has absolutely nothing to do with it being rust. They would have just as many issues with it if it was Go instead.
I have seen the reasoning they are actually presenting, and it is just various versions of “but I don’t want this to be here” even though they have the option of not interacting with it. nobody is forcing maintainers to support rust code in the thing they maintain, they just can’t prevent rust code from interfacing with it. their arguments are based purely on not wanting to interact with rust but they don’t have to, so they are wrong to block it.
Have you actually read the reasoning behind the anti-rust? it has absolutely nothing to do with it being rust. They would have just as many issues with it if it was Go instead.
I have seen the reasoning they are actually presenting, and it is just various versions of “but I don’t want this to be here” even though they have the option of not interacting with it. nobody is forcing maintainers to support rust code in the thing they maintain, they just can’t prevent rust code from interfacing with it. their arguments are based purely on not wanting to interact with rust but they don’t have to, so they are wrong to block it.
But did you read the exchange this conversation is about? It sounds like you’re operating on month-old headlines.