• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds great if you don’t have to commute many miles 2 times per day in an area with no public transit.

    All just to keep the roof over your head

    • what_is_a_name@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Two failures do not make a right.

      The point above stands. EVs do little for the environment. Compared to sensible options like transit and biking and walking they are marginally better, but hm hardly at all.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They reduce emissions in a neighborhood, in driveways and such, and they reduce sound pollution, which is great for local creatures.

        They shift power generation to more efficient platforms, rather than messy, poorly maintained gas engines.

        Battery production and recycling is a major issue.

        For those who cannot walk or bike, an affordable ev is a great choice

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, for many it cannot. For many job shopping is a luxury.

        • AOCapitulator [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What they were implying with their statement was that your life was made to be this way by the decisions of dead capitalists who caused infrastructure and the way we live our lives to be this way so that they could make money

          Housing laws caused suburban sprawl which has been worsened, at least in the US, by utterly foolish parking minimum laws. Thats why you have a commute like this, because cars were forced on us instead of trains, biking, and walking.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Original comment I replied to said “save the planet, ride a bicycle” and my reply related to that.

            I’d love a combination teleporter/blowjob machine but for now a shorter commute would be a treat

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                For many, job shopping is a luxury, and moving is a very high cost.

                You’re expressing a privileged opinion.

                That’s ok, we all have them, but what seems logical and obvious to some, is a simple impossibility to others.

                  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Because individuals buy and use cars, and the original comment I replied to implored commuters not to use evs and adopt a public transit /bike only lifestyle.

                    My comment discussed the pressures of life on the individual.

      • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but given the right government policy the provision of high quality, high speed, highly affordable public transport very much can be changed.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems to me like having to drive many miles to maintain a job that can pay enough to maintain your fairly far afield home (assuming the home costs less because it’s not in the same geography as the office) is a failure of the system as a whole and the company for not making their office work better for their workers.

      I mean, unless you have a storefront or regularly have to go to specific places as part of your job, like lawyers going to the court house, then why tf does the company pay for very expensive offices in the middle of a metro area? Put the offices where the workers can actually live near it.

      I work in IT, I go to the office to stare at a PC for 8 hours. Something I can literally do anywhere, but instead of IDK, working from home or having distributed offices spaces so people don’t have to drive as far, my companies only office is in the middle of a major Metro’s downtown in a high rise office for a massive amount of money. So now I have to pay, out of my pocket and time, to drive through downtown traffic, to a parking spot that costs me far too much monthly, so I can simply be physically there to do a job that only requires a PC and an internet connection.

      It’s all fucking stupid… And every company seems to do this. Nobody ever comes to our offices and there’s literally no reason for them to be where they are, or for me to be there.