• Famko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because they want you to complain about the developers and not their corporate overlords.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’ll push a shit ton of new pirates, thus creating more headaches for them if $100 games become the new normal. It’s almost like they love shooting themselves in the feet with a shotgun and then blaming everyone else as to why they can’t walk like they used to.

  • Adalast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    And this is precicely why I mostly play indie titles made by individuals or small teams that are sold for under 10 bucks. Fuck this noise.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Heck make them $250, i’m not buying them even at $70.

    If a game is over $30 it needs to be damn good to get me to buy it.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think the last two games I bought at some high premium launch price were GTAV and Cyberpunk 2077.

      That second one still stings. I played it longer than I should’ve probably because of the price, and I’ve not bothered with the DLC, even though people said it fixed the game. The price just left a bad taste in my mouth.

      • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It wasn’t for me either at first but I gave it another shot and it got its hook into me.

        What helped me was looking up a scoring/basic strategy guide that helped me figure out what super rookie mistakes I was making - this gave me a better eye for strategy when I was playing, which in turn translated to me enjoying the deck building aspect (which is a mechanic I know I enjoy).

        The game is good, and really great to pick up and put down in busts if you don’t have a lot of time.

        Hope you end up liking it eventually! I LOVE poker of all types, rogue likes, and deck builders so I thought this was a smash hit when I heard about it, but yeah, took a while to love it.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I keep seeing people comment that they really like it, I’m wondering if it’s completely inaccessible for someone who has never played poker?

          • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            You need zero poker experience to play it. It’s not a poker game at all, just uses poker hands for scoring, and if you don’t know them they’re all displayed if you hit esc.

  • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol, I’ll just wait until it’s on sale for 5 bucks. I’m patient enough.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the way.

      I always wait for the prices to drop before buying any game, and never ever pre-buy them. The only exception is early access from indie devs, I’ll help them along if they show promise.

      My jolly roger has been stuffed in a trunk somewhere for years, but looks like it might be coming out…

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nowadays it takes like a year or 2 for devs to fix all the bugs anyway. People who buy on day one or pre-order are suckers.

  • shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    If they do it, it would unfortunately still sell like hotcakes, being one of the most anticipated games of the past decade.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    some developers “hope” the next installment in the GTA franchise will be priced at $80–$100

    Management are NOT DEVELOPERS.

    Executives are NOT DEVELOPERS.

    Shareholders are NOT DEVELOPERS.

    • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I guarantee you not a single developer gives two shits about how much the game costs. It’s not going into their pockets regardless.

      • WiggleDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s not true. I’ve been a developer for 18 years on big AAA and small indie games. Most people I’ve worked with very much cared about pricing. When you work on a game and put years of hard work into it, you want it to be a success. If the game is not profitable, you might lose your job so of course you care when management shows up with a pricing strategy that doesn’t make sense to you. Sure, passion is a big part of making games but it’s also our job and we’re not oblivious to what the game we’re working on is worth.

        Oh and yes, we do get bonuses based on the performance of the game.

        • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Opinions on that one time Microsoft closed Arkane and the studio behind HiFi Rush, despite the latter’s success and the fact the former made Redfall a slop because of total mismanagement? I’m curious in how nervous that makes you as a developer and how common this bullshit is as seem from within; from outside, it’s basically all I remember about AAA because I don’t often interact wit the scene apart from reading.

  • NastyNative@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Rockstar I would say is one of the few that can demand that price. I would pay $100.00 bucks cause Im going to play it for the next decade. We could be on GTA15 but rockstar dont roll that way.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, and we have inflation going on, prices are going to increase. That’s not a crazy price for a game you’ll enjoy for years - if it’s not broken when it’s released. If you pay that money and have to wait for months of patches you’d prob be a bit pissed off.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    GTA 6 Devs: look at our amazing story and open world!

    YouTubers: I’ma drive an alligator up off this ramp, skip off the tallest building, and then land on a blimp!

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m loving the balls on studios. Yesterday we had “experts” suggesting it might cost 100 bux, and today it’s already the beggining of a trend. And the game isn’t even out. In fact, we only have the trailer for the game and they’re already predicting prices.

    My prediction is yes, they’ll ask 100$ and more, and yes, people will pay it.

    But the nerve, I swear. “Yeah, our games have gotten sloppier every year. And yes, we fired tens of thousands solely for profit reasons. But line must go up, so you better start paying”

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you really think people will buy it? I’ve played most of the GTAs, but I’m not about to spend 100 dollars on a video game.

      • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s enough people in what I assume to be big gaming communities, like active and paying and stuff, that are defending this, citing that other stuff got more expensive, too… and somehow not many agree that incomes have not risen proportionally. Them temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

        Somehow I think that most people defending this kind of crap are too young to actually have a first-hand feeling of how much prices for everything have risen.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re clearly not the target audience. Every slightly popular game has its whales. Something as popular as GTA? They’ll sell it at $100 and laugh all the way to the bank.

      • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look at Pokémon games, they sell like pancakes with barely an attempt at a story, minor gameplay improvements and barely running in their native hardware, their target audience will spend whatever they are told and defend the price no matter what.
        Same thing here.

          • Kyouki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not yet, might follow after this stunt faces no lash back and results in profits.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I don’t know though you’ve got to consider your target audience and their income method. The income method for the target audience of pokemon games is asking their parents.

              • Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’d love to get some numbers on this because I could believe it’s something like MLP:FiM, the target audience being kids but the main buyers being adults who enjoyed the show (or grew up with the games, in the case of Pokémon), anyway most parents just shell out money if it gets their kids off their back for a couple hours (examples are everywhere) and they don’t even care if it’s appropriate for their kids so I wouldn’t doubt they (or any publisher at this point) could just pump the prices for a mediocre game and sell just as much as they have so far.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Honestly this could all be a campaign from Rockstar to get ahead of higher pricing. They throw out $100 to some random people and let them run with it, so when they announce a $80/$90 price tag everyone bregurdingly goes along with it.

      • absquatulate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s what I’m thinking. Get the fanbase used to seeing 100+, and then suddenly an 80$ game will feel like a bargain lol

      • Kyouki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I honestly believe it, these test the water kind of leaks, more like intentionally invisible marketing to see the reactions

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      My prediction is yes, they’ll ask 100$ and more, and yes, people will pay it.

      Well the game could be disastrous and sell poorly after the first week.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        To be honest, they could launch the game as a 1 MB file that brings you to a black screen that says get fucked, and they would still make their money’s worth just out of the people who will blindly buy the game because they’ve been waiting for GTA 6 for so long that they bought it release day.

        And then they could just move back to GTA V pretending nothing happened because the same people that would have impulse purchased GTA 6 with zero research are also the people who play GTA V religiously spending money on the micro transactions there and that isn’t going to cut their addiction