I heard a bunch of explanations but most of them seem emotional and aggressive, and while I respect that this is an emotional subject, I can’t really understand opinions that boil down to “theft” and are aggressive about it.

while there are plenty of models that were trained on copyrighted material without consent (which is piracy, not theft but close enough when talking about small businesses or individuals) is there an argument against models that were legally trained? And if so, is it something past the saying that AI art is lifeless?

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    When you can’t tell if a machine made it, and it moves you personally, then what invisible metric are you defining, and judging it on?

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Same metrics anyone judges art by, what it says to them. This is incredibly context dependent.

      Show me the art and if just showing it to someone is insufficient, explain it to me.