What makes this your car?

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I live in a walkable city and I am an insufferable snob about it. It’s really nice being able to just go outside and get groceries. No traffic. No parking. No fuel. No insurance. No maintenance.

    • Dagrothus@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I live <.5 miles from Sprouts and Costco, yet it’s so sketchy to cross the intersection as a pedestrian that I have resorted to driving for groceries 🥲

    • Fleur_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same, still have a car though. Never driven it since I moved into the city. I feel so guilty about it 😭

  • zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    1997 Mazda Miata. Simple, reliable, easy to repair, incredible aftermarket support, huge community with a ton of knowledge, and an absolute joy to drive.

    Plus the headlights go up and down.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a Miata

      'Nuff said (I’m only slightly jealous). A car that’s undetappreciated by too many gear heads. It’s a modern version of a 1960’s Lotus. Love it

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      1994 Miata

      I wrecked my car recently and this might be the new one if I can’t fix it. Did you get a 94 for the reasons I think you got a 94?

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        94-97 have the bigger 1.8 motor which I wanted. Coincidentally the 94 was the first year to switch to the new freon for the AC system so if I need to get it recharged (which I do) I don’t have to pay an arm and a leg for ancient AC that won’t even work well.

        The guy I bought it from had 4 Miatas and actually prefers the 1.6 since you have to work harder for the speed, but the car is slow enough as is. It doesn’t need to be any slower.

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          If I’m not mistaken, the 94 is also the only year to have the 1.8 but still using OBD rather than OBDII, which supposedly makes it easier to slap a turbo in.

          Preferring the slower version is wild, haha. I’ll be moving from a VQ platform so losing ~200HP is going to be an adjustment.

            • papalonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Interesting! Any idea if it’s uncommon or anything? From what I’d read (which is admittedly not a lot), 95 is when they’d switched to OBDII, but maybe they made the change in the middle of the production cycle?

              • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                I think 96 was the first model year that had it. But the OBD2 mandate took effect in 1995 (for the 96 model year).

                That said I’m not turboing the car and it currently has a check engine light so obd2 would be really nice right now.

              • Pavidus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                You know, I’m not certain on that. Now I’m gonna have to do some reading! I was just happy it had that combo when I bought it.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Ford focus RS.
    My old car was sporty (RX8), and I wanted another sporty car, but I wanted AWD because I was done with RWD in the snow. I needed a 4 door, because I was planning to have a kid. That really limited my options.
    I liked the AWD system in the focus over the WRX STI or Golf R.
    I don’t really like it anymore, though. It’s a really rough ride, and the seats are uncomfortable for long trips. And it’s kind of a boring car when it’s not snowing.

    My wife has an Hyundai Elantra GT. It’s pretty much the only car we use now, it’s way more comfortable to drive.

    We’re probably gonna sell both of them and get an Ioniq 5.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    A bike is my preferred method of transport. Just a simple 3x7 steel hardtail mountain bike. It keeps me in shape and can go just about anywhere.

    When I have to drive, a manual Subaru tends to be my ride: Capable, reliable, and fun I guess. I also use an ebike if I have to haul a lot but don’t want to drive.

    If it’s going to be in city only, the old Honda Fit is hard to beat functionally: Easy to park, very maneuverable, and lots of storage.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I was looking at mountain bikes recently and found out the new norm is 1x. Been ages since I rode a 3x, but going to 1x seems attractive if only to remove the shifter.

      I too bike around town, on 25mm tires, and usually with a trailer though. Such a joy to get everything done under your own power. Obviously this isn’t the post to tout such ideas, but more people should be riding around the city.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        First I’d heard of that in mountain biking, unless are you thinking of the r/Xbiking subreddit? They often repurpose MTBs, sometimes with 1x, but often with other drivetrains too.

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I was surprised too. Went into a local shop and every single one of their mountain bikes, be it full suspension or otherwise, was 1x.

          They said most of the time a chain gets spit off a ring, it’s the front, so people have been converting over to 1x to keep the chain on, and going to 10-12 on the back to make up for the lost range.

          No idea if it’s bologna or marketing but it seems to be the new trend. I’m guessing it’s beneficial moreso in competitive circumstances, but the only time I spit my road bike chain out is when I shift under too much pressure. I don’t really do much trail riding on account of not having an appropriate ride, so I’m just going off what this one person said.

          They look nice though without a front derailleur. Makes me want a fixie.

            • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Right, I should’ve been more specific. I haven’t shipped for a bike in eons so I don’t know when they became common. Last I remember using everything was 3x7 or so.

              Would be funny to use a single speed on a trail though.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve got a Seat Alhambra. It is basically a VW Sharan, but cheaper, and I bought it for space. Seven seats if needed, five with quite some space for transporting things, and down to two seat and a lot of space if that is needed (and I ran this configuration twice in the last three weeks, so it is not something once-in-a-cars-lifetime like.

    It also has a trailer hitch which allows me to pull 1.8t. That’s a feature I have only tried to see how it works out, pulling a trailer around the block and doing some reversing and parking with it to see how it works, but the hitch was included and might be needed next year, so I’m fine with that.

    I originally wanted to buy an electric car, but at that time, most electric cars were overpriced matchboxes on wheels, so they were simply useless for me. At the moment, the VW ID Buzz is one electric model that would do size-wise, but it is way, way too expensive, and it is ugly as f-ck to boot. If prices and design have reached acceptable levels, maybe the next one will be electric.

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    2013 Toyota 86. My parents bought it for me when I lived in Perth. Love it to death: the looks, the way it drives everything. Since moving to Melbourne It’s been sitting in a parking spot for 6 months. I feel terrible for it. If anyone knows any nice places to take it for a day trip or a couple day city getaway I’d love to know.

    So much makes it mine but if I had to pick one thing it’s the work I’ve done on it. I’ve done services, given it new wheels (after crashing and wrecking the old ones lol) and replaced parts. One particular thing I really enjoyed doing was getting a replacement throw-out bearing for it. A big moment for me was arguing with my dad about what was causing problems; listening to my gut over his advice and doing a massive job of taking out the gearbox and clutch. Im still riding the high I felt when I saw that rusted fucked up throw-out bearing. So happy that I managed to do such a big replacement part job without any issues.

  • Celestus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    2022 Polestar 2 with all the options. I think the Polestar is super cool, and I didn’t want to replace my Tesla with another Tesla. I got it used last August for $36k, because used rentals were flooding the market. This car goes for $70k new, but it is not worth anywhere near that

  • wirelesswire@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I drive a 2018 Subaru Forester. I got it because I wanted a SUV with AWD and a turbo charger. My previous vehicle was a Camaro, and while I loved driving it, having a RWD car in the winter sucks, and I had recently bought a house, so having a vehicle that can carry more than just groceries made sense.

    I was driving the Camaro around Xmas time and there was a light dusting of snow on the highway. I hit a patch of it and started to fish tail, and that scared the hell out of me, so I traded it for the Forester the following fall. The Forester has handled any conditions I’ve come across so far like a champ, including heavy rain, snow, ice, and muddy hillsides.

    Trading the Camaro in and getting the Forester marked the transition (in my mind) from being a young adult, to becoming an older, more sensible one. I was driving home from work one day, and a Camaro passed me on the highway. I couldn’t help but sigh and ask myself why I had to get old. The Forester is a good vehicle and very nice (got the XT Touring package), but the Camaro was way more fun to drive, and I still miss it. I’d like to get another sports car in the future, but we’ll see if that happens.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Tires make all the difference. Both the size/proportion and materials.

      I’ve had RWD cars that were beasts in the snow (East Coast ice no less) because they were near perfect weight distribution and had the best winter tires on the market (Nokian).

      I’ve had AWD cars that sucked, because the car was poorly balanced, the tire sidewall was too small (so the tire can’t flex much), entry level winter tires (rubber was harder), and stupid electronic traction control that tried to out think the driver but just got in the way.

      RWD will still usually be more challenging to drive than AWD (I think even more so with RWD cars post 2000), though some AWD systems can be unpredictable. Part of the issue with newer RWD cars is the tire sizes - it can be hard to get proper winter tires (plus they cost a lot). I’ve seen some cars for which winter tires didn’t exist, or were exorbitantly expensive to get (it’s assumed by both car and tire manufacturers that these cars won’t be driven in snow).

      Fortunately Subaru uses a dead simple AWD system (basically open diffs at each end) - the most complex thing they do is use the brakes for traction control/torque distribution, which is less likely (In my experience) to get in the way than things like electronic diffs (can you tell I’m a fan of Subaru AWD?).

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve driven RWD sports cars in the snow with ease. Tires are aboslutely everything. People tend to ignore their tires for WAY too long before getting them replaced, and/or get shitty all seasons that suck in every condition possible.

        The trend of “I need AWD SUV because snow” terrifies me because people are buying bigger, heavier, and worse handling cars when they really just need better tires. A FWD sedan with good tires will do WAY better than an AWD SUV with crappy tires. The only upside is people will tend to put better tires on their SUV because it’s more expensive than their shitty sports car/sedan.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I drove an RWD sports car in Canadian winters, and despite researching tires and getting the best I could find, stop and go traffic on snowy hills was stressful.

          That said, people who think an SUV is gonna make driving in snow safer are just not thinking at all.

          I got an AWD sedan to replace my RWD coupe.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That joke never gets old …… when I first got mine, I happened to be wearing flannel and drove to Maine with my wife. So many lesbian jokes, but my beard was a bit more literal

  • billbasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Daily: 2011 Subaru STi wagon. It’s fun, speedy, has excellent traction for the mountains and snow where I live, and can transport 4 people with snowboarding gear.

    Fun: 1955 Caddie. My great uncle bought it new so this is nostalgic.

    Moto: 1982 Yamaha XS650. I use this for joy rides in the mountains and to save on gas

  • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    My legs.

    But, if I was forced to choose, I’d go with an RV, and then live out of it. No in-between. Why?

    I have two preferred modes of living. One is without a car in a walkable area. The other is with a car, and my house is attached to the car. Everybody already gets walkable cities, but having an RV would warrant the freedom to be able to bring all of my possessions anywhere I want, whenever I want. For practicality, I’d use a motorbike for travelling after parking the RV. This is the only way I could own a motor vehicle–it must serve a purpose beyond merely moving a few people and objects between point A and point B. Else, I don’t want one.

    The only cars I’ve been at all interested in otherwise are old Honda Stepwgns, the Peel Trident, station wagons, and, indeed, motorcycles. Still see no point in these when a hypothetical RV would be much better for a solo road trip, and when I can go on a vacation via plane or another friend’s car. I’m not going out alone.

    I don’t like single-use items. I prefer everything I have be as multi-purpose as possible.

    EDIT: I should probably clarify I would live out of an RV. It’s not just a hypothetical alternative, it’s something I’m considering.