Moderation is work. Trolls traumatize. Humans powertrip. All this could be resolved via AI.

  • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if it worked 90%? It doesn’t need to be perfect, just better.

    An injustice against one of us is an injustice against all of us. 90% isn’t good enough. Hell, 99% isn’t good enough.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Human moderators who tweak the AI settings are still biased. So you haven’t solved any problem by throwing AI in the middleof it all.

      • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But they can be checked and balanced by other moderators unless it’s a one mod/one admin system; in which case then it’s just a personal fief. Where’s the checks and/or balances for theftbox moderation?

        Y’know, if I had a physical watch, I’d be looking at my wrist really condescendingly right now.

        • infinite_ass@leminal.spaceOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          AIs can be checked too. And judged, tweaked, etc. Obviously

          Groups of moderators can be just as biased as individual moderators. More so even. Given the amplifying effects of echo chambers.