• seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I half agree with his gun regulation stance. While ideally there would be more caution given to who owns guns that is unfortunately not the world americans have been living in the last 80 years or so. The fascists have guns, lots of them, and I’m not giving mine up while they have them.

    Everything else he said is 100% based.

    • Lilium@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, yeah, fascists having guns is a “randomly giving guns to any moron with a pulse” problem.

      • Andreas@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        When you’re in power, the fascists are the “morons with a pulse” who don’t get guns, but when they’re in power, YOU’RE the moron with a pulse who loses your ability to defend yourself. The point is to remove the ability of the authorities to decide who gets the right to own weapons, because it can easily be turned against you. Besides, morons obtain weapons illegally all the time. Firearms ownership is illegal in my country (except for licensed use like hunting) but we still have problems with gun violence because of weapons trafficking.

    • workinkindofhard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I do think it is funny that there is significant overlap between the ACAB crowd and those that would want to disarm (or at least heavily restrict) the average Joe so only police have access to modern firearms

    • Hexorg@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah the gun law regulators generally ignore the fact that everyone and their grandma already has guns. And those with guns are not willing to do trade in programs.

      I’d like to see better psych eval and requiring to re-license every so often. That should start steering the country in the right direction. Of course I don’t see this happening any time soon.

      • jiml78@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        The US has no chance of passing anything around licensing of firearms in the short term. We can only hope that Gen Z votes all the gun nuts out of office.

        • stankbucket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not much of that matters if you can’t get 2/3 of the states to get in line with your re-write and we can’t get 2/3 of the people to agree on anything. Also, there is a wide swath of opinion between what you call “gun nuts” and what other people call “common sense laws.” Very few people are arguing that “any moron with a pulse” should have a gun.

        • The Doctor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          They can vote against the ammosexuals all they want. Many politicians get money from firearms companies, though, on both sides of the fence, and they all know which side their bread is buttered on.

    • rakkhun@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think fascists is going too far… they’re crazy and dumb, that’s it.

      • Venus@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nah, they’re fascists. Maybe not every republican, but a solid 70% or so of them. And a decent chunk of democrats too.