fede@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 6 months ago"They already have your data"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down10
arrow-up117arrow-down1image"They already have your data"lemmy.worldfede@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square14linkfedilink
minus-square7112@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoFor many people it’s easier to not care… they don’t want to bother with long term consequences of their behaviors. I simply ask them if they would be OK with a company taking money out their bank account. Your data is valuable. Why give it away for free?
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months ago I simply ask them if they would be OK with a company taking money out their bank account. This is as unconvincing an analogy as , and for the same reason.
minus-squareEm Adespoton@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoUnconvincing to whom? That campaign did an amazing job of equating copyright to property ownership for an entire generation. It’s not accurate, but I think we’ve seen that it can be very convincing for most people.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoI wouldn’t recommend trying to trick people into caring about their privacy: it’s not good for your reputation or your long-term relationship with them.
For many people it’s easier to not care… they don’t want to bother with long term consequences of their behaviors.
I simply ask them if they would be OK with a company taking money out their bank account.
Your data is valuable. Why give it away for free?
This is as unconvincing an analogy as
, and for the same reason.
Unconvincing to whom? That campaign did an amazing job of equating copyright to property ownership for an entire generation.
It’s not accurate, but I think we’ve seen that it can be very convincing for most people.
I wouldn’t recommend trying to trick people into caring about their privacy: it’s not good for your reputation or your long-term relationship with them.