Excellent progress was made this week towards the goal of full sound theme support in Plasma 6, among other topics–including some important performance work for KWin!

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I want to see KDE focus on its UX a bit more and break a bit of harmful backwards compatibility. Having multiple rows in the window header like the combination of a title bar a menu bar and an action bar that makes their combination tall AF, having a thousand disjointed panes, apps being completely rigid and non-responsive and using dated customisation options that only lead to inconsistent and ugly results when tampered with, and rejection of design paradigms that get praised and adopted by everyone like headerbars, all in the name of old theming technologies that depend on practically technical debt, like X11. KDE needs to adopt a vision that looks towards the future, not the past. Until then, I’ll stay in GNOME.

    • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      rejection of design paradigms that get praised and adopted by everyone like headerbars

      please, use gnome and forget about the other de

    • Andy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many of us don’t praise or want titlebars controlled by apps individually, and there are more reasons to keep them separate than just backward compatibility, FWIW.

      But if you haven’t checked it out lately, you may want to look at the MauiKit/Nitrux stuff.

    • Rhabuko@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      headerbars

      Nothing against your personal preference but I take a good global menu integration over headerbars every single day 🙂.

    • bslinux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t use Plasma if I didn’t have the option to turn on menus. The hamburger menu was a horrible design for desktops. Give me a title bar, menu bar, and toolbar. Small screen devices might benefit from minimization but not the desktop.

    • Reva@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know why some people insist on making every single desktop look, feel and work the exact same.

      Just use Gnome. Nobody needs your “UX” ideas here. Otherwise we’d also use Gnome.

    • Ignacio@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep a more minimalistic approach to UI/UX would be great for KDE but I don’t think we will see it in Plasma 6

    • Gogo Sempai@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      KDE feels like it has been designed by developers themselves whereas Gnome feels like it has been designed by actual designers. The UI/UX is more polished and beautiful, better than even MacOS imo. But as a power user, I prefer KDE. The amount of customization it offers is unmatched, overwhelming even.

      • flyos@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It may feels that way to you, but KDE, and especially Plasma (since Plasma 5) has been designed by professional designers. We owe this notably to Jens Reuterberg who created the Visual Design Group within KDE, a group that is still very much alive. The feeling probably rather stems from the fact that KDE’s vision for design is less inclined toward a strongly polished, opinionated interface, but rather to preserve user’s choice?