Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) single-handedly raised the stakes of the 2024 elections on Tuesday, revealing he’d consider carving out rare exceptions to allow votes on protecting voting and abortion rights.

Schumer’s plan would move the Senate closer to getting rid of the filibuster, a longtime rule that requires 60 votes instead of a simple 50 vote majority to advance legislation.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    No, I think undecided or apathetic voters who are not currently engaged in voting will be motivated by the Dems actually doing something before the election and seeing the GOP obstruct it. More motivated than by Dems saying they will do something in the future, which they constantly fail to do.

    Just fucking do something.

    I speak from experience as an unaffiliated voter who votes against Republicans, but isn’t really voting for Dems because I think they will do anything. Just because it is the best chance to make the GOP lose.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Evidence should be easy to find if the effect is as obvious as you suggest, no?

          edit: Look, as charming as this back-and-forth is, I’d like to present evidence to the contrary. This kind of gesture doesn’t register at all with voters, and makes zero difference in their motivation to vote, because Democrats tried to codify abortion rights into federal law in 1989, 1993, 2004, 2007, 2013, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 and folks like you are still clamoring for them to “just do something”. If they open the floor for another inevitably doomed bill and do more “something”, people will still bitch and moan that they’re not doing anything, just like they always have.