• Chetzemoka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    WOW the number of people in this thread immediately jumping to the accusers being “false” and deserving jail. Because no actual sexual predator ever got away with it in court…

    (Sex crimes are extraordinarily difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt because the actions are taken in private without a lot of physical evidence. Which sexual predators rely on to get away with their crimes, by the way.)

    Perhaps we should review the sheer volume of young men from all over the US & UK reporting that Spacey was at best inappropriate with them. One of the youngest being 14 years old:

    https://people.com/tv/kevin-spacey-controversy-timeline/

    And just in case some of us need a refresher course, the rate of false rape accusations is low:

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21164210/

    And the rate of sexual assault is high:

    https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/fastfact.html

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed. In a thread a couple of days back on a different (though related) subject I was accused of being a rape apologist because I was insistent on the presumption of innocence and the beyond-reasonable-doubt standards that need to be overcome when accusations like this are slung. But it works the same in the other direction too - we can’t assume that an accuser is guilty of fraud or libel or filing false reports or whatever just because they failed to prove their case.

      It would not be good for justice if these situations ended up being “now that the accusation has been made someone is going to go to jail, either the accused or the accuser.” The Thunderdome is not a good model to emulate.

      • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        accused of being a rape apologist because I was insistent on the presumption of innocence

        Good thing to insist on, but be prudent. Keep in mind that, at least on reddit, there’s a tendency for every thread about rape to become a thread about false accusations. I wasn’t there, but in general, sometimes people object not to the presumption of innocence but to people bringing it up.

    • soft_frog@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this whole thing isn’t simple. Even if he’s cleared of charges, these allegations are old and that makes them hard to prove or disprove.

      Further, the quantity is concerning. Maybe he’s just prolifically sexual but my gut can’t really get passed how many accusations there are over such a long span of time. Even if innocent, still creepy is my opinion.

      • Givesomefucks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general, any multimillionaire that gets off of a serious charge doesn’t mean they’re innocent.

        It just another example of having ridiculous amounts of money in our legal system means it’s really hard to be hel accountable.

        Hell, trump got off of beating and raping his wife, because of an old ass New York law that said a husband can’t rape his wife under any circumstance.

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          In general, any multimillionaire that gets off of a serious charge doesn’t mean they’re innocent.

          Don’t forget the flip-side of that - the prisons are full of poor people who do not deserve to be there. It’s almost as if the system was designed to be like this…

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, being a multimillionaire puts a target on your back. I’ll never forget the story about a man who already had a couple of million winning a huge lottery and how lawsuits, among other ever worse things, destroyed his life.

      • roguetrick@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        the quantity is concerning

        And also not admissible in a criminal court. That’s part of the problem. If you look at the big picture, it’s obvious he did it, but it’s not as easy to prove it in criminal court.

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it really obvious that he did something, or is it obvious that he’s another gay man being attacked for daring to publicly admit that he’s gay? Sure there’s a lot of allegations, but many of them were dropped by the accusers, and as the article points out there was a huge rush of “me too” allegations brought out against many people at the same time because it was the trending get-rich-quick scheme. Even in Spacey’s case, why did most of these allegations not come out until he admitted he was gay?

          IMHO if Spacey is actually guilty of these crimes, he’s going to be blackballed by all the studios and won’t ever be seen on the screen again. Although the courts didn’t prove him guilty, the studios know who is doing what, and in today’s market any further allegations will cost them money.

          • Aa!@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even in Spacey’s case, why did most of these allegations not come out until he admitted he was gay?

            I think it went the other way around, didn’t it? At least the first accusations came out, and he used the occasion to say “I didn’t do that! But now that I’m talking about this stuff, by the way I’m gay.”

            It wasn’t a great look, because it came across that he tried to deflect the accusations by coming out as gay.

            • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              True enough, and he caught hell for the timing of that announcement. There’s also the issue of there just being such a different culture of what’s “acceptable” in Hollywood. I think it’s great that it finally came to light and those activities were at least tempered somewhat, but I also remember reading a lot of claims a decade ago and just thinking to myself that this is something you’re claiming ‘everyone’ in Hollywood is doing, but you chose to specifically target this one actor? The “me too” train was real, and a lot of people were going after big name actors, so I got burnt out on the whole thing and just stopped paying any attention to it.

    • geolaw@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A depressing number of victims of child sexual assault commit suicide, and thus their testimony cannot be used by the prosecution. For example, in Australia, the case of George Pell.

      • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I refuse to believe you’re actually this stupid. There’s a universe of difference between “it didn’t happen” and “it couldn’t be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court” and you know there is.

        Unless you really think OJ didn’t murder his wife either

        • capt_deez_nuts@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I refuse to believe you’re actually this stupid. You’re throwing these statements as if you have first hand experience of knowing these things happened. Like were you there in person when Spacey was assaulting these people or were you a witness when OJ killed his wife? You don’t wanna believe the witnesses, you don’t wanna believe the jury, you don’t don’t wanna believe in the legal systems (cops/courts and whatever have you). But you believe in some people accusing someone of something. EVEN if they cleared themselves of these accusations.

          Are you actually this ignorant to not know that all people are all not down to earth and sometimes people can and do crazy shit. Why do you think there’s zero percent chance that these people were bad, but Kevin Spacey is 100 percent bad without a shadow of a doubt for seemingly just being rich?