• fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    From the article: “Even knowing that Kamkar’s silent, invisible, long-distance laser spy trick exists, how does anyone hide their secrets from it? He suggests that companies install double-paned or reflective glass. Some security device companies also sell protection devices that affix to windows and vibrate them to prevent laser microphone spying, and Kamkar concedes he hasn’t tested his attack against those. But he also suggests a safer countermeasure: “Don’t work on computers visible from a window,” he says. “Or just have dirty windows.””

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Companies can’t even be convinced to have longer passwords on their wifi. And open office plans mean every computer faces a window

        • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The problem is the companies aren’t suffering the majority of the consequences of the security breaches, it’s the people these companies have personal information on & that includes people who have never done business with these companies but that these companies purchased data on.

        • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          But I work at companies and I would like my info to not be hacked. Their fuck ups affect employees and customers