A little old but interesting non the less

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s probably why it is recommended by the US government. They like things they have control over.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s also funded by the CIA. Although Signal is/was also indirectly funded by US Congress via OTF, and some claim that means the CIA is somehow involved too. Of course, computers, the internet and tor also had major US government funding, for what it’s worth.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because in most cases it isn’t encrypted, when it is it severely reduces functionality, and it doesn’t even use a crypto alg that’s widely approved of by trusted crypto experts?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I hope you are joking

      Telegram has strong ties to the US government. It isn’t encrypted by default and has a closed source system.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    if a hostile party has access to the handset, that encryption isn’t particularly helpful

    Things like Molly-FOSS might help better with that, keeping its database locked and encrypted at rest on its own separately from any OS encryption or security. Perhaps GrapheneOS or similar could be beneficial as well.

    If you want something with not so many government ties, and maybe more decentralized, there is also SimpleX, Briar and Tox.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The problem with Molly encryption is that you can’t receive notifications when it is locked. That isn’t a easy problem to solve but it is something to keep in mind.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        True but you can at least have it require biometrics to reopen the app and you can still get notifications then because the db is technically unlocked.