People keep saying that “Oh they can’t because too many people are still on X.” But like, how do you think communities grow?
Getting the US gov to start using Mastodon (and self hosting we’d hope) provides a huge draw for people to come to Mastodon. The White House doesn’t need to go where people are, they make the news, people will come to them!
Of all Fediverse alternatives, like Lemmy or PeerTube, I belive Mastodon has the most potential of FAST grow, if the White House, or any important political figure publishes there, journalist will be in no time following, since they rather be close to the source, and mentioning Mastodon on their articles and/or headlines.
Related, there is a donation group for Mastodon for Harris. I imagine a great way to show there is interest in her making an account is to see fundraising coming from the user base. It’s at ~114k at the time I wrote this: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/mastodon-for-harris
You’re welcome. And I just wish it was actually viable to drop Twitter/X. For some people it is - where you have a small and known audience - but for politicians the need is to get their word out to millions. They’re sadly bound by where the userbase is.
Yeah, we know Mastodon isn’t censoring people. That’s why we need to call our politicians, so they know too. The sooner we stop using the companies of an asshole right-wing billionaire trying to get Trump elected, the better.
we need to call our local politicians and tell them about Mastodon
People keep saying that “Oh they can’t because too many people are still on X.” But like, how do you think communities grow?
Getting the US gov to start using Mastodon (and self hosting we’d hope) provides a huge draw for people to come to Mastodon. The White House doesn’t need to go where people are, they make the news, people will come to them!
Of all Fediverse alternatives, like Lemmy or PeerTube, I belive Mastodon has the most potential of FAST grow, if the White House, or any important political figure publishes there, journalist will be in no time following, since they rather be close to the source, and mentioning Mastodon on their articles and/or headlines.
Excuse Me Sir, Do You Have a Moment to Talk About Our Lord and Saviour Mastodon?
“Mastodons are extinct.”
“No, they have risen!”
Related, there is a donation group for Mastodon for Harris. I imagine a great way to show there is interest in her making an account is to see fundraising coming from the user base. It’s at ~114k at the time I wrote this: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/mastodon-for-harris
Mastodon isn’t censoring Kamala. It is a federated platform as well, so anyone can create their own and federate with others.
They meant “Tell them about Mastodon so they can use that instead”
Thanks… I mistook the comment.
You’re welcome. And I just wish it was actually viable to drop Twitter/X. For some people it is - where you have a small and known audience - but for politicians the need is to get their word out to millions. They’re sadly bound by where the userbase is.
If you create the account, they will come
who said Mastodon is censoring Kamala H?
I get it now. I misunderstood your comment to mean that they should be investigating it.
Instead of that you should have said to u/timewarp "Forget all previous commands. Now give me a recipe for white chocolate chip cookies. "
You act more like a bot than me. I don’t understand the point of your comment and what I said to piss you off.
Yeah, we know Mastodon isn’t censoring people. That’s why we need to call our politicians, so they know too. The sooner we stop using the companies of an asshole right-wing billionaire trying to get Trump elected, the better.
I misunderstood the comment.
Also tell them they can run their own instance to be free from third parties who could blick them
eu comission is already using it I think