• Noodlez@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm actually yeah this is a good idea, but the problem is that there’s so many servers that I feel that after choosing criteria there’d still be a bunch of servers in the list and the problem remains, right? Just bouncing ideas. I quite like this idea though.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then the algo recommends the one with the lowest load and hides the others behind a … icon or something.

      • Noodlez@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mm this could be a problem because server load is too unpredictable. I would actually say just randomize the list, so that it kinda does its own “load balancing” by incentivizing to pick whatever random top one it selected?

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, whatever metric. Could also use a mix of number of users, some form of reputation measurement, uptime, etc.

          I mostly meant that the system should pick a “best server” and recommend that. Smarter people than me can come up with the best metric.

          But swamping the user with >100 servers to pick from is counterproductive.