• crusa187@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the tragic half-truth espoused by the corporate media claiming there are two sides to this issue.

    Every time, they fail to complete the statement: “…give up private, but Medicare coverage will be better

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand why getting rid of private insurance keeps being brought up. Afaik none of the proposed laws would remove it. The point should be that the universal healthcare is good enough you don’t need private insurance.

      In Canada there is provincial healthcare that everyone gets for free, and many people still have supplemental insurance (private or employer provided) to expand coverage for things like prescriptions, eye, and dental.

      • crusa187@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s such a great point. It’s not like single payer would close down private insurance companies. The truth is they would just become redundant and people would realize they’re not needed, then choose to stop wasting their money on them…unless they can pivot their business to provide additional and desirable service beyond what people get from universal coverage.